Sheeted Clastic Dikes in the Megaflood Region
Sheeted Clastic Dikes in the Megaflood Region, WA-OR-ID-MT
Skye W. Cooley
Abstract
Clastic dikes are sediment-filled fractures found worldwide in deformed sediments from the Precambrian to the Pleistocene. Most are soft sediment deformation features and the products of liquefaction caused by seismic shaking. The dikes described in this article are wedge-shaped, vertically sheeted, and sourced from above - characteristics that contrast with typical liquefaction dikes. This study investigated unconsolidated sediments along the path of the Ice Age megafloods between Priest River, ID and The Dalles, OR and found clastic dikes in 282 of 529 exposures (as of April 2022). Dike distribution, width, age, injection direction, absence in paleoseismic trenches excavated across Yakima Fold Belt fault scarps, and occurrence entirely wittrhin Ice Age floodways indicate the dikes are nonseismic structures formed by rapid loading and hydrofracture during glacial outburst floods. They are flood injectites, not seismites. This study is the first to map and measure sheeted clastic dikes throughout the Channeled Scablands region.
Sheeted clastic dike. A vertically-sheeted clastic dike intrudes silty-sandy late Pleistocene megaflood rhythmites (Touchet Beds) at Smith Hollow Rd in the Tucannon Valley, WA.
Dike-sill-dike. Dike follows a least-resistance pathway through a stack of Touchet Bedsat Lewiston, ID. The dike tends to cut vertically across the finer grained, low-permeability silt layers and follow bedding in the coarser, higher-permeability sands. The orientation of fill bands flips between vertical in the dike segments and horizontal in the sill segments. Geometry of the entire dike, mostly out-of-plane, is likely a branching structure with blade-like pinchouts both laterally and on bottom (i.e., KGD hydraulic fracture model).
Dikes intrude a variety of substrates. Sheeted dike intrudes hillslope colluvium composed of angular, locally-derived basaltic clasts. Prior to being reworked and transported by a catastrophic outburst flood, the material composed a scree slope on the flank of the Alder Ridge anticline. Columbia Gorge, WA.
Olaf P. Jenkins was the first geologist to report on the clastic dikes in the Columbia Basin. This 1923 photo shows Jenkins standing next to a large dike exposed in a gravel pit near Touchet, WA. The caption reads, "Clastic dikes in Touchet Beds and dust dune between Touchet and Walla Walla". This dike is sourced in light colored slackwater sediments overlying the darker sand. Source: Washington Geological Survey Archives (#00604)
Touchet Beds in Burlingame Canyon. Many geologists have visited this classic locality near Lowden, WA. About 40 Touchet Beds are exposed here (Waitt, 1980, 1985). These rhythmically-bedded flood deposits are widely distributed across Columbia Basin of WA, OR, and ID. Elsewhere, slackwater deposits occur in thinner packages with greater sedimentologic variability, reflecting the local flood/backflood/ponding conditions and valley configurations. Measurements on clastic dikes was collected from all of the well known sites documented in numerous field guides and research articles, including Burlingame Canyon, and from hundreds of others not previously described. Photo source: Washington Geological Survey Archives (1978, #3455). See Footnote 5.
Publications on clastic dikes. Ninety-four articles, abstracts, field guides, agency gray lit, and consultant reports have been published on the clastic dikes in Eastern Washington. Most simply mention the dikes in passing. Few contain measurements or data of any kind. Many of the Hanford articles derive from a single infiltration experiment conducted on one large dike located off Army Loop Road.
Way out west. Comparison of the Columbia Basin (downward-injected, wedge-shaped dikes) to the New Madrid Seismic Zone (upward-vented sand blows). Columbia Basin dikes also occur in the Columbia Gorge downstream of Wallula Gap and in Willamette Valley as far south as Salem, OR (areas outside oval). Several USGS careers have been dedicated to studying liquefaction features in the New Madrid region (Fuller, 1912; Obermeier and others, 2005). No careers have been dedicated to clastic dikes in the larger Columbia Basin. Relief basemap by USGS.
Seismic hazard map. Earthquake hazard probability based on 2018 USGS models (fault-slip rates, frequency, magnitude). Red-orange indicates a high probability for damaging quakes. Green-blue indicates a low probability. Note the difference between the Columbia Basin (Low: green-yellow) the New Madrid Fault Zone (High: dark red-red-orange).
Shaking intensity map for the 1949 Puget Sound earthquake (M6.7, VIII). Note the hit-and-miss nature of felt reports and variability in shaking intensity pattern east of the Cascade Range (I to IV). Slackwater basins show no evidence of amplification. Figure from Chleborad and Schuster, 1998 - USGS PP 1560).
Seismic exposure comparison. Seismic exposure chart for population centers in the United States. Curves show peak accelerations corresponding to a 10% probability of occurrence for the indicated exposure times (Algermissen, 1988; Rogers and others, 1998). Are major faults at New Madrid, Wasatch Front, coastal California, or Puget Sound analogous in any way to those in the Yakima Fold Belt of Eastern Washington? Fundamental differences exist between the bedrock, structure, surficial sediment, climate, and hydrology, not to mention the geometry, character, and distribution of clastic dikes preserved in unconsolidated sediments.
Basalt province boundary or floodway boundary? Sheeted clastic dikes are found in sediments overlying thick Miocene basalts in the Columbia Basin (Pasco Basin, Yakima Fold Belt, Palouse, Willamette Valley Subprovinces), but not in sediments overlying thinner basalts of the Blue Mountains Subprovince and Idaho-Nevada Graben. Subprovinces map modified from Tolan and others (2009, Figure 1).
Previous Work on Clastic Dikes
Clastic dikes in Missoula flood deposits are noted in classic papers on Channeled Scablands geology (Bretz, 1929 field notes; Baker, 1973; Waitt, 1985; Smith, 1993; Atwater, 1986), however, reports containing detailed descriptions of the dikes are few (Jenkins, 1925; Lupher, 1944; Black, 1979; Woodward-Clyde Associates, 1981), and those containing field measurements are downright rare (Alwin and Scott, 1970; Cooley and others, 1996; Neill and others, 1997; Ward and others, 2006). Several articles speculate on dike origin, but contain little to no data (Flint, 1938; Newcomb, 1962; Bingham and Grolier, 1966; Jones and Deacon, 1966; Beaulieu, 1974; Carson and others, 1978; Shaw and others, 1999; Pritchard and Cebula, 2016). Eighty years of reporting on Pleistocene deposits at the U.S. Department of Energy's Hanford Site (1,518 km2) has provided no clarity on the dikes’ origin. The voluminous Hanford literature contains few field measurements and lacks a regional perspective. It is rife with speculation, much of it contradictory (i.e., Bjornstad, 1980; Bjornstad and others, 1990, 2001; Bjornstad and Teel, 1993; Fecht and others, 1999; Bjornstad, 2006, Bjornstad and Lanigan, 2007). See Footnote 1.
Proposed Origins
Four origins for the dikes have been proposed: earthquakes (Jenkins, 1925), ground ice (Alwin and Scott, 1970; Black, 1979), desiccation (Lupher, 1944), and floodwater loading (Brown and Brown, 1962; Baker, 1973). A dubious fifth, “multigenetic” (Black, 1979; Fecht and others, 1999), suggests the dikes formed by a combination of these processes. Cooley (2015) provides a concise summary of the arguments for and against each hypothesis.
This Study
I investigated unconsolidated, partially-lithified sediments, and flood-scoured bedrock along the path of the Ice Age megafloods between Priest River, ID and The Dalles, OR. Clastic dikes with vertically sheeted fills were identified in 282 of 529 exposures (as of April 2022; more found since). Locations where soft sediment deformation was abundant were also mapped. Sheeted clastic dikes are identical throughout the study area with respect to sedimentology, age, structure, taper direction, and scale. All appear to have formed by the same mechanism during the Pleistocene.
Future Work
My field data collection effort could be repeated if the outcrops remain. I take excellent field notes and maintain an organized archive of information on outcrops I have visit. If a future geologist is interested in revisiting sites at which I collected measurements, they would complete the task much quicker since a map now exists to guide them. Locating and accessing dozens of new (previously unreported) outcrops throughout an unusually large study area took an enormous amount of time and effort. I have spent hundreds of days in the field and personally funded all costs associated with this project. If you are a student or geologist interested in conducting your own project on clastic dikes, please feel free to contact me. Happy to help.
Study sites.
Locations with sheeted clastic dikes are shown as black circles. White circles denote locations where no dikes were observed. Stars denote locations with abundant soft sediment deformation with or without dikes. Star symbols are offset from outcrop circles for clarity. A dashed line approximates the Cordilleran Ice Sheet margin at LGM. Glacial Lake Columbia is shown at its 600 m elevation shoreline. Sediments observed at all locations (n = 488 shown on map) consist primarily of unconsolidated Pleistocene-age flood and non-flood silts, sands, and gravels (Touchet Beds, Pasco Gravels, Palouse Loess) sometimes overlying Neogene sediments and bedrock (Ellensburg Fm, Ringold Fm, CRBs, sedimentary interbeds). Thick Holocene sections were surveyed for dikes as well. Light gray areas show the extent of ephemeral slackwater lakes Lewis, Condon, Latah, Upper Columbia, and Foster that formed behind bedrock or ice constrictions (black bars A,B,C,D,E). Dikes are common in southern part of the Channeled Scablands, where silty, sandy rhythmites were deposited. Gravel deposits, Palouse Loess, and lacustrine silts in the Glacial Lake Missoula basin contain few dikes. Dozens more sites have been surveyed since this map was published.
Deformation varies along the flood route. Various kinds of soft sediment deformation structures occur in the Channeled Scablands (light blue area). The particular style of deformation is governed by grain size, saturation, lithification/cementation - factors that determine how sediment will respond to stress (loading). Different flood facies express deformation differently (i.e., Touchet Beds vs. silt-clay varves vs. bar gravel) and local flood dynamics (flow depth, flow energy) play an important role (i.e., high energy channel vs. deep slackwater lake vs. lake-filled stilling basin). The dashed blue line follows Atwater's long profile between Glacial Lake Missoula and Wallula Gap (Atwater, 1987, Figure 2). Each map symbol represents one or more outcrops.
Typical Clastic Dikes
Clastic dikes are sediment-filled fractures found worldwide in deformed sediments from the Precambrian to the Holocene. Most clastic dikes in the sedimentary record are soft sediment deformation features (ductile deformation) and the products of liquefaction (fluid escape) triggered by seismic shaking. Strong shaking elevates pore fluid pressures in wet, unconsolidated sediment, causing it to mobilize and vent to the ground surface, forming sand blows. Therefore, most earthquake-generated clastic dikes have upward-tapering forms, contain massive sandy fills, and serve as feeder conduits to sand blows.
Sheeted Injectites in the Ice Age Floodway
The clastic dikes described here are different. They are slender, sheeted, wedge-shaped structures that were filled from the top. They formed by the forceful infilling of hydraulic fractures propagated downward into sedimentary and bedrock substrates during periods when glacial outburst floods inundated large portions of the Inland Northwest. Injection style and timing are consistent with overloading and deformation by catastrophic glacial outburst floods and deep, slow-draining slackwater lakes that accompanied them, >200 m deep in places.
Examples of typical sheeted clastic dikes and flute casts.
(A) A typical clastic dike in slackwater rhythmites (Touchet Beds) exhibits the characteristic vertical sheeting composed of darker fill bands (sheets) separated by light-colored silt skin partitions. This example contains ~12 sheets and is filled with silty, sandy sediment closely resembling the host material. Umatilla Basin at Cecil, OR (Slackwater Lake Condon). (B) A typical dike in gravelly deposits is truncated at its top by a second floodbed. Its fill is crudely sheeted and lacks silt skins. Dikes in coarse-grained deposits tend to have lower length-to-width ratio than dikes in fine-grained sediments. Umatilla Basin at Willow Creek, OR (Slackwater Lake Condon). (C) Examples of flute casts that ornament the faces of silt skins. Upward-pointing noses are clear directional indicators. Sediment entered the fractures from the top. Quarters for scale. Walla Walla Valley, WA (Slackwater Lake Lewis). (D) A sheeted dike, filled with a mix of silty, sandy flood sediment (Late Pleistocene) and quartzite-rich gravel from the Ellensburg Fm eroded from local exposures by floodwaters, intrudes micaceous, oxidized fluvial sandstones (Miocene) at Snipes Mountain. The dike contains ~10 sheets. Hoe is 28 cm long. Emerald Road at Granger, WA (Slackwater Lake Lewis).
(a) Size - Sheeted dikes penetrate more than a dozen different geologic units, including Miocene basalt. The largest examples contain >100 vertical sheets (fill bands), are >2 m wide, and penetrate to depths >40 m. Typically, the dikes are <15 cm wide and contain fewer than a dozen sheets.
(b) Fills - Sedimentology of the fill material reflects the local geology. Dike fills contain a mix of basaltic and micaceous sandy sediment swept up and carried by the floods (suspended-load). Basaltic and non-basaltic material eroded from localities along the floodway comprised the bedload. Dikes at Snipes Mountain, WA (Yakima Valley), for example, contain conspicuous clasts from the Miocene–Pliocene Ellensburg Fm that cap the ridge. Dikes at Foster Creek (upper Columbia Valley) contain Miocene gruss shed from granitic highlands to the north. Dikes near Walla Walla Valley contain Touchet Bed sediment and some ice-rafted exotics (Jenkins, 1925; Cooley, 2015). In the southeastern Palouse, dikes filled with Touchet Bed sediment overprint older dikes containing weathered, oxidized fills of sand and silt (Cooley and others, 1996; Spencer and Jaffee, 2002; Bader and others, 2016).
(c) Sheeting and Growth - The dikes are conspicuously sheeted “composite” structures (sensu Hyashi, 1966). Vertical sheeting records incremental widening by repeated crack-and-fill cycles. Dike growth involved crack-and-fill cycling during single events (compound dikes) and reinjection over time (composite dikes). New fractures opened into and alongside older ones. Strong grain size contrasts between adjacent sheets are evidence of a variable and changing sediment source consistent with circulating bottom currents within floods.
Per descendum. Sheeted dikes and an assortment of sag structures disrupt Missoula Flood deposits exposed along Latah Creek at the Qualchan Golf Course near Spokane, WA.
(d) Polygonal Networks - Burned areas and bladed cutslopes expose dikes in plan view (i.e., Silver and Pogue, 2002). The dikes form polygonal networks. Plan view exposures reveal how dikes coalesce and intertwine as they lengthen. The most well-developed polygonal networks containing the largest dikes occur near the centers of low elevation basins inundated repeatedly by glacial outburst floods. Sheet counts are highest where many floods gathered - near Wallula Gap through which all floods flowed.
(e) Silt Skins - Thin silt partitions (silt skins) form the dike walls and separate vertical sheets of sediment (fills bands) inside the dikes. Silt skins form when pore water migrates laterally out of the saturated fill, through the fracture wall, and into the surrounding material. Skins between sheets indicate younger fills dewatered into older, drier fills (older fills are exposed to new leakoff) and into dry host sediment (unsaturated sediment). Fines are screened at fracture walls and accumulate in continuous layers (filter cake), sealing the fracture. Crack sealing begins almost immediately after the fill enters the fracture and progresses quickly. An analogous filter-screening process forms slurry walls in concrete-filled trench foundations used in heavy construction. Silt skins in study area dikes are 1–10 mm thick. New sheets crosscut older sheets and remove portions of their silt seals (erosive injection). Rip-ups of older fills, skins, and host material are common in crosscutting fills. Upward-pointing flute casts that ornament the faces of silt skins unambiguously record downward infill. Skins that line the outer walls of dikes are fluted only on their interior faces. Skins on outer walls indicate the host sediment was well-drained, ice-free, and above the water table (vadose zone) at the time of injection and probably during most subsequent crackings and fillings. Outer skin formation via leakoff appears to require unsaturated conditions and porous host material. Dikes that penetrate impermeable bedrock lack outer skin walls, but contain interior partitions. "Leakoff halos", a term I coin here for lightly cemented, slightly discolored zones of altered sediment that extend a few centimeters beyond the dike wall, are fairly common. They can only form in unsaturated host sediment. Leakoff halos (and sheeting) are less common in liquefaction dikes because the sediment which mobilizes to form such dikes and the sediment from which they emerge are equally saturated.
Dike propagation.
The various parts of an advancing crack and near-simultaneous filling by sediment and dewatering. Modified from Phillips and others (2013).
Cemented leak-off halo.
Slight cementation of the host sediment can occur just beyond the margin of some dikes. This halo is evidence of "leak-off", the diffusion of pore water out of the fill during dike injection and probably for a short time after fracture propagation and before filling halts. Hwy 24 near crest of Yakima Ridge.
Leak-off halos formed while you wait. The dark region surrounding this clay-rich dike is wet. There are three possible explanations. 1.) Pore water in the surrounding sand is moving along the margins of the less-permeable dike and emerging at the vertical cutface. The dike's shape is highly irregular in three dimensions. The wet, dark zone that surrounds the dike indicates ground water is moving both downward and laterally through the near vertical bluff. Cemented halos around dikes may be in part diagenetic, forming long after a dike is emplaced. 2.) Pore water moving through the sand is held more tightly in the halo region due to a slightly more silt mix there. Silt particles were deposited during and shortly after dike injection via leak-off (dewatering). Silty sand holds onto pore water longer than pure sand. This is the way Hanford folks think about clastic dikes that commonly appear wetter than the sediment that surrounds them. 3.) Dike remains an active conduit. Groundwater today moves faster through the dike and diffuses outward into the sand. Conduit behavior and leak-off in the unlified dike is ongoing, though the dike is >10,000 years old. This dike is composed of and intrudes Pleistocene-age glacial sediment. It is part of a deformed zone, continuous over a half mile of shoreline bluff, thought to have formed by fluidization and mass wasting (Nelson and others, 2003; Swanson, 2007?; Tucker 2015; Troost, 2016; Knight, 2019). Location is Double Bluff on Whidbey Island, WA. The exposure was not scraped prior to taking this photograph. My photo from Feb 2023.
Bulbous forms on outer walls.
Leak-off, or the dewatering of dike fills, creates bulbous forms on the vertical outer walls of some dikes. The bulbous forms resemble load casts. Hwy 397 west of Finley, WA.
Leak-off lumpkins.
The outer surface of a silt skin wall is often covered with structures that look very much like tiny load casts, a type of sole marking. These "lumpkins" are consistent with outward diffusion of pore water into drier surrounding sediment at the time the fracture formed and filled. Walla Walla Valley.
(f) Distribution - Sheeted dikes are widely distributed throughout the region inundated by Ice Age floods. Great distances separate outcrops containing dikes with identical characteristics. More than 500 km separates my northernmost site near Kettle Falls, WA from my southernmost at Salem, OR Thanks to Ian Madin and Ray Wells, who provided locations and photos of dikes near Portland and Salem. Sheeted dikes intruding Willamette Silt (Touchet Bed-equivalent deposits) were discovered in the basement of the Oregon Capitol Building during a recent remodel (Ray Wells, photos and written communication). Sheeted dikes exposed along the Willamette River and reported by Glenn (1965) are identical to those in Eastern Washington. Dikes do not occur in the Palouse Loess above the local elevation of maximum flooding (i.e., above ~366m in Pasco Basin), nor in unconsolidated sediments beyond the margins of Ice Age floodways. Dikes occur in close proximity to active Quaternary faults (i.e., Wallula fault zone) and at sites located >150 km from them. They are most abundant, well-formed, and best-exposed in high silt content flood rhythmites in protected backwater valleys adjacent to high-energy flood coulees. Silty, sandy rhythmites contain dikes that are commonly long and slender. Coarse sands and gravels (little silt) typically contain few dikes. Dikes sourced in flood gravels are crudely sheeted and stubby (low length-to-width ratio). Where slender sheeted dikes penetrate coarse-grained sediment (or bedrock) below, silty-sandy rhythmites always occur above. Slender, sheeted dikes are nearly always sourced in silty-sandy material.
(g) Age - Field relationships constrain the timing of dike injection to between ~1.8 Ma to ~14 ka, the period of ice sheet growth and scabland flooding in Eastern Washington (Easterbrook, 1994; Baker and others, 2016; Waitt and others, 2016). However, most injections occurred late, during the Missoula flood cycle (18–14 ka). The dikes penetrate all formations exposed to overland megafloods, including all variants of Late Wisconsin Missoula flood deposits, pre-Wisconsin scabland deposits (“ancient” flood gravels, silt diamicts, paleosols), calcrete-capped Pliocene–Pleistocene alluvium ("Cold Creek unit"), Pliocene Ringold Fm sediments, Miocene–Pliocene Ellensburg/Latah Fm sediments and interbeds, and several Miocene Columbia River Basalt flows. The dikes cut the Mount St. Helens Set S tephra (16 ka), but not the Mazama Ash (6.8 ka). No dikes were found in Holocene deposits during this study and I am aware of no other studies reporting sheeted dikes in Holocene alluvium. Sheeted dikes did not form prior to the Pleistocene or since.
Typical Touchet-type dike. Missoula flood rhythmites R1 through R7 deposited by separate floods are intruded by a typical Touchet-type clastic dike. The dike originates at the base of R7 (within the rhythmite stack) and descends through several underlying beds. It does not crosscut the entire the section, rather it formed during one flood (flood that deposited R7) in the middle of the Missoula flood period (18-14 ka). Other dikes descend from older and younger levels in the stack. The dike cuts a clean path through the host sediment and does not follow a rubble zone between laterally-translated blocks. Bedding contacts are not offset, tilted, or laterally spread across the dike. No low angle sliding surfaces are present in the outcrop. Both branches taper downward to a point. The sediment that fills the dike was not supplied by a liquefied sandy layer at depth (a bed below R1) as would be the case if it fed a sand blow (i.e., Fuller, 1912; Obermeier, 1998), rather the source of the dike is clear. It begins at the base of rhythmite R7. Widening at the top of the dike is a small sag, not the truncated edifice of a sand blow. Bedding at the top of the dike grades smoothly upward into R7. Flute casts on the interior faces of the dike's walls provide clear evidence of downward infilling. This example exhibits the characteristics typical of sheeted Touchet-type dikes found throughout the region. Location is Burlingame Canyon, WA.
Slender, wedge-shaped injections.
My conceptual model for sheeted clastic dikes in the megaflood region developed from relationships observed in the field. This particular combination of geological and hydrological factors combined to facilitate a particular style of diking that only occured during Pleistocene overland flood events. Flood loads fractured the relatively dry, brittle substrate allowing wet, circulating sediment sourced at the base of the flood to immediately fill the fractures.
Conceptual sketches comparing liquefaction dikes to injection dikes.
(A) The sketch illustrates differences between clastic dikes formed by liquefaction (sand blows, fluid escape structures) and those formed by floodwater loading and hydrofracture (flood injectites). Liquefaction dikes propagate upward and are sourced in wet, sandy beds deposited sometime in the past and remobilized by strong shaking. "Feeder dikes" tap a buried source. Flood injectites are sediment-filled filled hydrofractures that propagate downward. The dikes are "fed" by sediment sourced in circulating bottom currents of glacial floods moving overland (megafloods). Liquefaction dikes in A cut younger strata and are filled with older sediment. Injection dikes in B cut older strata and are filled with younger sediment. (B) My dike-fill generations concept sketch explains the formation of sheeted clastic dikes in episodically-aggrading flood sediments. The four geometries represent the range of forms found in the study area: a). Unsheeted - Single-fill, b). Sheeted - Multi-fill compound, c). Sheeted - Single-fill composite, d). Sheeted - Multi-fill composite. Compound = Multiple fill bands injected during a single event. Composite = Multiple fill bands injected during two or more events separated in time during which no injection occurred.
Dike abundance and geometry differs in slackwater rhythmites vs. flood gravels.
(A) Dike forms differ because fine and coarse materials respond differently to perturbation (loading by floodwater). Grain size governs whether pore fluid pressures will build or disperse, and whether slender fractures or stubby collapses will form. Loaded sediment containing abundant silt tend to respond by fracturing (pore fluids conveyed in fractures). Sediments that lack silt tend to respond by matrix flow (pore fluids flushed through interconnected pores). (B) Dike injection appears to be primarily a slackwater phenomenon due to the necessary combination of silt deposition (low-velocity flows during megaflood events), prolonged loading (deep water), and preservation (low erosion). (C) High silt content rhythmites (Touchet Beds) contain abundant clastic dikes with high length-to-width ratios (slender dikes). Sparse dikes in gravelly flood deposits (channel, bar, and sheet flood gravels) are typically stubby and crudely sheeted.
Thick, dry, brittle vadose zones.
Catastrophic overland floods imposed tremendous loads on the ground surface, causing it to fracture. Backflooded valleys accumulated thick piles of unconsolidated sediments. While aggrading flood sediments raised the ground surface, they do not appear to have raised the water table. Water table reset to pre-flood levels between floods. A dry vadose zone grew thicker with each flood. Flooded substrates took on a wet over dry over wet configuration. Brittle fracture in the dry vadose zone may have been necessary for slender, sheeted dikes to form. Valleys with dense networks of Touchet-type dikes also have thick vadose zones of sand and silt (minor gravel). Liquefaction dikes, rare in the Channeled Scablands, are shown in the cartoon for comparison.
Discrete deformation. The deformation associated with a dike is limited to the crack itself. The sediments immediately adjacent to the dikes in this photo are undeformed. Clear bedding contacts and delicate bedforms continue across each dike. Dikes are filled with Late Pleistocene Touchet Bed sediment and intrude fluvial sandstones of the Miocene Ellensburg Fm. Quartzite cobbles in the fills were reworked from cobbly Ellensburg nearby. Snipes Mountain, WA.
Discrete deformation. A sand-filled dike cuts cleanly across silt-sand rhythmites at Starbuck, WA.
Pleistocene dikes in Miocene basalt. Sheeted sedimentary dikes with unconsolidated fills, sourced from above, intrude Columbia River Basalt flows exposed at the surface during Ice Age flooding. The dikes exploit older weaknesses in the bedrock. A.) Weaver Pit in Walla Walla Valley, WA, B.) Hwy 12 in Lewiston Basin, ID, C.) Hwy 14 in Umatilla Basin, OR.
Liquefaction Evidence in Paleoseismic Trenches in Eastern Washington
Evidence of liquefaction in the study area is minimal. It would be a stretch to say sporadic. In the few instances where liquefaction in Pleistocene sediments have been reported, it expresses as small, irregular, anomalous bodies. Those reports are:
- Foundation Sciences (1980) reported finding features possibly attributable to liquefaction features at Finley Quarry near Pasco, WA (Wallula Fault Zone). The blobby, ambiguous features are small, unconnected to a source bed, and partially trend with bedding. Their seismic origin (Sherrod and others, 2016) is disputed (Coppersmith and others, 2014). At best liquefaction is confined to tight corridors along some Yakima Fold Belt structures.
- Ambiguous forms in Holocene sediment revealed in a USGS trench opened near the Wallula Fault Zone were interpreted as liquefaction features by ("SUK" trench; Angster and others, 2020). The linear feature targeted for trenching has since been revealed to be an old ranch road, not a fault scarp. No fault was discovered in the SUK trench. Touchet Beds beneath the "liquefied" loess were undeformed, a finding that casts doubt on USGS's interpretation. Read my review of the SUK trench site is here: https://www.skyecooley.com/single-post/fault-scarp-or-ranch-review-of-the-usgs-suk-paleoseismic-trench-near-wallula-wa.
No liquefaction was reported in other paleoseismic trenches excavated across fault scarps in Eastern Washington:
- Burbank Fault trench near Yakima, WA (Bennett and others, 2016).
- Wenas Valley trench (Sherrod and others, 2013).
- Saddle Mountains Fault trenches at Smyrna Bench (Bingham and others, 1970 Plates 4,5,6).
- Buroker Fault trench southeast of Walla Walla (Farooqui and Thoms, 1980, Figure 11).
- Lind Coulee Fault trenches at O'Sullivan Dam-lower Lind Coulee (GEI/West & Shaffer, 1988).
- Gable Mountain Fault trenches at the Hanford Site (Bingham and others, 1970; Golder Associates/PSPL, 1982).
- Spencer Canyon trenche near Entiat, WA. The trenched scarp is believed to have formed during the 1872 Chelan quake (magnitude ~7).
- Kittitas Valley trench (Szeliga/CWU/USGS in progress 2023).
Paleoseismic trenches in south-central Washington.
Fault trenching project locations. Base map from Lidke and others (2003). The Finley Quarry site (not shown) is located just south of Kennewick. The Spencer Canyon site (not shown) is located ~60km north of the Kittitas Valley site. Paleoseismic trenching has revealed no connection between the dikes and the movements of specific faults in the Yakima Fold Belt province. I review published trench logs for most of sites shown on the map at this post: Paleoseismic Trenches in Eastern Washington
In Depth: Gable Mountain Trenches The Gable Mountain trenches are particularly instructive. Several trenches were dug and a number of serious geologists inspected them. Golder Associates/Puget Sound Power and Light (Bingham and others, 1970 Plates 8, 9; Golder Associates/PSPL, 1982) opened several trenches across two thrust faults at Gable Mountain at the Hanford Site. The South Fault displaced by ~50' Miocene bedrock and the Rattlesnake Ridge sedimentary interbed that separates Pomona and Elephant Mountain flows. Overlying Hanford Fm sediments (Missoula flood deposits) were not displaced. The Central Fault displaced the interbed by 182', but overlying Hanford Fm by only 0.2' (Reidel and others, 1992, p. 43-44). No liquefaction was found in any trench. A single clastic dike, sourced from above in flood-laid Hanford gravel, descends into the fault breccia in Elephant Mountain basalt (Trench log GT-2 in Reidel and others, 1992, Figure 39, p. 45). No other dikes were noted in the 92'- long trench. Philip S. Justus, a geologist for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, clearly links the dikes to flood deposits not faulting in a memo summarizing his findings at the Gable Mountain trenches (Justus, 1980).
Flood deposits on Gable Mountain bear a close resemblance to typical Missoula flood deposits.
Two distinct cycles of [Ice Age flood] deposition are present on the north side of Gable Mtn; possibly three on south side.
Clastic dikes on Gable Mountain are similar in lithology and fabric to those found elsewhere in the Pasco Basin.
Clastic dikes associated with each overlying [flood] cycle are found in Trenches CD-8, G-2, and G-3.
The youngest clastic dikes originate from the base of the coarse upper unit of flood deposits which is bounded at the top by St. Helens S ash as found in Trenches CD-4 and G-1.
Clastic dikes in Trenches CD-5 and G-3 are displaced by shearing on the fault plane (CD-5) and in the hanging wall (G-3).
In Trench G-3 displacements in the flood deposits appear to post date the youngest clastic dike.
Shears, possibly associated with the thrust fault, appear to cross and slightly displace clastic dikes in the footwall in an area of Trench CD-6.
Clastic dikes along fault plane in Trench CD-6 have slickensides surfaces with strikes parallel to the dip of the fault.
Oriented slickensides in clastic dikes parallel to slickensides in gouge on fault breccia (Trench CD-5).
Wherever fine-grained material is present along fault plane, slickensides are present.
Key take aways from the Gable Mountain trenching project are a.) clastic dikes are typical Touchet-type dikes, b.) the dikes are sourced in surficial material (flood deposits) and descend into fault-fractured basalt below, c.) dikes are not particularly large or numerous near the Gable Mountain Fault, d.) the dikes are not liquefaction structures sourced from below and formed in response to shaking, but sediment-filled fractures that propagated along a zone of weak fault breccia, and e.) slickensides and offset dikes suggest some minor faulting occurred after flooding and diking at ~12,000 years.
In Depth: Lind Coulee Fault east of O'Sullivan Dam
Paleoseismic trenches opened at Lind Coulee (south bank of O'Sullivan Reservoir) by GEI/Michael West exposed a few clastic dikes intruding the shear zone of the Lind Coulee Fault, an eastern extension of the Frenchman Hills thrust. The fault is exposed in shoreline bluffs between Rd M SE bridge and the Lind Coulee West Trench Site. It places Roza basalt over Pleistocene loess.
Lind Coulee West Trench Site.
Paleoseismic trenches at Lind Coulee were opened in the 1980s as part of a dam safety study. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation operates the nearby O'Sullivan Dam located east of MarDon Resort just north of Drumheller Channels. The dam is not shown in the photo; it is located a few kilometers to the west. The dam impounds Lower Crab Creek, which west flows through Lind Coulee, forming the vast Potholes Lake. Hwy 262 crosses the dam.
Findings in the Lind Coulee West Trench are similar to those at Gable Mountain. Geologists observed Pleistocene dikes intruding gouge zone of the Frenchman Hills fault that offsets Quaternary sediments,
The Lind Coulee trench initially presented strong circumstantial evidence for fault displacement of [basalt, reverse-magnetized loess, shear zone-fault gouge, and late Pleistocene loess with a petrocalcic horizon]. The evidence for displacement was magnified by the protruding knob of brecciated basalt [seven meters from west end of NE-trending trench], the apparent overturned contact with flood deposlts on the north side of the knob, flood sands injected along a shear plane in the fault zone and discontinuity of the petrocalcic horizon and infiltration of loess north of Station 7 [near west end of trench]. The geometry of flood deposits overlying the paleosol on the footwall block was also suggestive of colluvial wedge geometry.
Upon further investigation, West and Shaffer modify their interpretation,
In spite of this body of circumstantial evidence, we could find no evidence of shearing, tectonic displacement or colluviation characteristic of surface fault rupture. The [flood-deposited] sands along the shear plane appear to have been injected hydraulically along the plane rather than dragged along it.
They determine dike injection post-dated faulting,
The lacustrine silt [that separates “intermediate” flood deposits from “youngest” flood deposits] could be traced as a continuous, uninterrupted horizon across the main fault zone, indicating with 100% certainty that the fault had not moved since deposition of the silt layer. Careful excavation of Unit 5B [“intermediate”] flood deposits disclosed no evidence of shearing or tectonic colluviation. These deposits were in intimate contact with the eroded basalt surface on the hanging wall and exhibited an open-work fabric that we attribute to high energy flood deposition.
Busacca and McDonald (Appendix V) conclude the flood deposits exposed in the trench are not related to the most recent episodes of flooding (about 12 to 16 Ka) but are older…based on soil development and stratigraphic position that the age of flood deposits in the Lind Coulee West area is 40 to 50 Ka. The last surface fault displacement, therefore, occurred before 40 to 50 Ka.
The apparent injection of flood sands along a shear plane in the fault zone is more difficult to explain. We are of the opinion that the sand was injected hydraulically from the top down. The sands filling the shear however do not appear to be continuous with flood deposits mapped as Unit 5 [“intermediate” flood deposits].
Similar injection of flood sands along shear planes was noted in fault trenches excavated on Gable Mountain (DOE/Westinghouse, 1987b).
The authors agree with earlier speculation by Woodward-Clyde Consultants (1981), namely that the dikes formed by,
…either hydraulic injection associated with catastrophic flooding or hydraulic injection resulting from fault movement and liquefaction offer reasonable interpretations for the origin of clastic dikes including the feature in the Lind Coulee West trench.
They dutifully entertain an alternative origin for the dikes (liquefaction), despite finding little supporting evidence in their trenches,
Another possibility is that the sands were injected from below and are part of an older flood deposit preserved deeper in the footwall. The exposures in both cross-cut trenches suggest older flood deposits are indeed involved in faulting and could be preserved at depth in the footwall and locally along shear planes…
Lind Coulee Fault at O'Sullivan Reservoir.
The Lind Coulee Fault is a south-dipping thrust that places Miocene basalt (Wanapum Roza) over younger sediments. There are several splays. Grolier and Bingham is first identified it in their draft and final reports (Grolier and Bingham, 1971; 1978 Figures 14, 23). West and Shaffer trenched it in the 1980s. A good, easily accessible vertical exposure remains. The photo above and Sketch A show Roza basalt shoved over alluvial sediments (likely Pliocene Ringold Fm), cemented loess, and weakly-cemented Palouse loess (likely late Wisconsin age). Sketches show the observable field relationships. The fault cuts rubbly Roza basalt, creating a thin white gouge zone. Beneath the gouge is a sliver of brown mudstone (hanging wall) which is underlain by cemented buff-colored loess with light band of caliche. Faint bedding in the loess and a parallel caliche are both steeply dipping to overturned directly beneath the fault. The shattered footwall Roza is brecciated and weathered above the fault and takes on a greenish-yellow hue. The rubbly basalt grades upward to competent basalt then spheroidally weathered basalt near the flow top. The flow top is also exposed along Hwy 262 just south of the trench site. Elsewhere along the fault, the gouge zone (10-20cm wide) includes boudin-like lenses of deformed dark and light brown mudstone, rock flour, or broken basalt. Investigations of the Lind Coulee Fault Trench site and longer traverses of shoreline bluffs in the area have yielded no evidence of liquefaction. Lind Coulee Fault is part of the larger Frenchman Hills structure, known to have Quaternary movement (Reidel and Fecht, 1994; Schuster and others, 1997; Lidke and Haller, 2016). USBOR memos recount some details of West's trenching project from the perspective of the client (Lefevre and O'Connell, 1987; Galster, 1987). References for the Lind Coulee Fault include Grolier and Bingham (1971, 1978), Galster/USBOR memo (1987, "Area No. 2"); Levfevre and MCConnell memo (1987), West and Shaffer (1988), Shaffer and West (1989), Reidel and Campbell (1989, "Stop 21-A", Figure 14), Geomatrix Consultants Inc. (1990, "East Fault Exposure"), Reidel and Fecht (1994), Schuster and others (1997), Lidke and Haller (2016). A big thanks to Brian Sherrod for sending me the West and Shaffer (1988, Vol. 2) report in Feb 2023.
In Depth: Willamette Valley
The Missoula floods backflooded the Willamette Valley dozens of times, depositing gravels and silt-sand rhythmites across the floor of the valley to Eugene, some 170 km south of Portland. Ice-rafted erratics numbering in the hundreds are mapped throughout the Willamette Valley (Allison, 1935; Minervini and others, 2003) and areas upstream (Bretz, 1919). In general, most exposures of Pleistocene deposits in the valley contain few dikes if any. Exposure is not great. See historical photos and unit descriptions in Bretz (1925, 1928), Allison (1932, 1933, 1936, 1953, 1978), Piper (1942), Treasher (1942), Lowry and Baldwin (1952), Baldwin and others (1955), Allison and Felts (1956), Wells and Peck (1961), Trimble (1957, 1963), Balster and Parsons (1969), Hampton, (1972), Robert (1984), McDowell (1991), Yeats and others (1996), and McDowell and Roberts (1987). Abandoned ideas about seawater incursion into Willamette Valley and Columbia Gorge are found in Condon (1871) and Bretz (1919).
River Bend section. Glenn (1965, Figures 3, 15) reported finding a few clastic dikes in Touchet Bed-equivalent flood rhythmites (Willamette Silt) in the Willamette River Valley.
Glenn (1965) found a few sheeted dikes cutting Missoula flood rhythmites (Willamette Silt) exposed along the Willamette River at River Bend and Irish Bend. Allison (1978, Figure 14) shows a clastic dike cutting a rhythmite section near St. Paul, OR. The dikes were found in highway excavations in flood deposits near Portland (Ian Madin, 2014 written communication/photos) and in exposed dirt walls in the basement of the Capital Building at Salem, OR (Ray Wells, written communication/photos). Thurber and Obermeier (1996, unpublished) reported finding 16 clastic dikes at 7 sites along the lower Calapooia River, a tributary to the Willamette River. The largest dike measured 5m long x 10cm wide. They interpreted the dikes to be earthquake-caused liquefaction features. Sims (2002) reviewed Thurber and Obermeier's report, finding their field data set too small to support their interpretations,
The limited area surveyed by [Thurber and Obermeier] in the Willamette Valley does not allow for a high level of confidence in determining if the features result from large subduction events or local intracrustal events. The age of the structures is somewhat in doubt as few radiocarbon dates are available for the host deposits and Thurber and Obermeier (1996) do not report any radiocarbon dates as part of their study. They also do not mention any evidence for liquefaction in post Pleistocene deposits of which there are many in the banks of the Willamette River and its tributaries. Thus, with incomplete coverage and lack of dating of paleoliquefaction features, the question of source zones is moot. Earthquake source determination can only be addressed with broader coverage of liquefaction features and better age data to constrain timing of events and to allow regional correlations of liquefaction features. In addition, we need a more complete picture of the size distribution of similar-aged features for the purposes of evaluating the magnitudes of prehistoric earthquakes.
Peterson and others (2014) describe sand dikes and sills (unsheeted fluid escape structures) intruding Holocene overbank muds at 8 sites along the lower Willamette River. They attibute the dikes to seismicity at the Cascadia margin. Obermeier and Dickenson (2000) describe "relict liquefaction features" in low shoreline bluffs of islands in the lower Columbia River between Astoria, OR (Marsh Island) and Kalama, WA (Bonneville Dam) and in cutbanks of 10 rivers east of the Cascade divide. The thickest dikes were 30 cm. The thickest sills were 5 cm. Authors attribute the dikes to lateral spreading, hydraulic fracturing, and surface oscillations (ground shattering and warping) during earthquakes (i.e., Cooley and others, 1996; Neill and others, 1997; Pogue, 1998). Obermeier and Dickenson is a consultant's that follows USGS and DOGAMI studies on evidence of Cascadia shaking along the lower Columbia River (Obermeier, 1993; Peterson and Madin, 1997; Atwater, 1994). The report contains some of the same information as Sims (2002) and Thurber and Obermeier (1996), but no photographs or sketches of clastic dikes or vented sand. Takada and Atwater (2004) describe soft sandy sediments in the lower Columbia River gorge deformed by magnitude 8-9 Cascadia earthquakes. The features they describe are wholly different than wedge-shaped, sheeted dikes in the Touchet Beds and the sediments that host them. Their dikes of fluidized sand are outnumbered by sills that "mostly follow and locally invade the undersides of mud beds. The mud beds probably impeded diffuse upward flow of water expelled from liquefied sand. Trapped beneath mud beds, this water flowed laterally, destroyed bedding by entraining (fluidizing) sand, and locally scoured the overlying mud."
Identical clastic dikes occur exclusively inside the floodway, mostly in Missoula flood sediments of both the dry Columbia Basin and wetter Willamette Valley. The sheeted, wedge-shaped structures are restricted to a specific interval of time (Pleistocene) and sourced only in Missoula flood deposits. Fine grained sediments outside the floodway do not contain dikes. Touchet-type dikes (sheeted, slender, wedge-shaped structures) are readily distinguishable in the field from unsheeted, younger dikes formed by liquefaction. The field evidence from the Willamette Valley supports a common origin for all sheeted clastic dikes that occur in the Ice Age floodway: fluid-driven fracture triggered by repeated flood loading.
In Depth: Toppenish Ridge
Two gravel pits near Granger, WA are located in close proximity to the Toppenish Ridge Fault, an east-west trending Yakima Fold Belt structure known to be active. Miocene Ellensburg Fm conglomerates are exposed in both pits. Sheeted dikes occur at the Lower Pit (more distant from fault), but not the Upper Pit (nearer the fault).
At the lower pit (225-250 m elevation) several large, sheeted dikes sourced in Touchet Beds intrude downward into fluvial conglomerates of the Miocene Ellensburg Fm, mapped as Mc(e) and Mcg(e). The flat-lying Touchet Beds are inset into the older conglomerates. Here, both units are essentially flat-lying. At the upper pit (265-295 m elevation), the Ellensburg dips steeply south (>50 deg). Very few dikes were found in the tilted beds despite an abundance of sandy layers and their proximity to the Toppenish Ridge Fault, mapped <200m away.
Toppenish Ridge gravel pits near Granger, WA. In the Yakima Valley, Ellensburg sediments, deposited by the ancestral Columbia River and smaller streams draining the Cascades, interfinger with and overlie the Columbia River Basalts. Green areas of the map are Miocene Ellensburg Fm sediments. Light brown areas are basalt flows. Gray areas are late Pleistocene Touchet Beds. Yellow is recent alluvium of the Yakima River floodplain. Sheeted dikes occur in the lower pit (minimally deformed strata), but not the upper (steeply tilted strata). Touchet Beds occur in the lower pit, but not the upper. The town of Granger is a short drive to the east. Land owned by the Yakama Indian Reservation.
Upper pit at Toppenish Ridge. Steeply-dipping, partially lithified fluvial sediments contain almost no clastic dikes and little evidence of liquefaction despite abundant sandy interbeds (light colored). The Toppenish Ridge Fault, which the USGS identifies as an active structure, is mapped less than 200 m away (Schuster and others, 1994; Lidke and others, 2003; USGS Quaternary Fold and Fault Database for the United States, accessed Dec 2022).
Lower pit at Toppenish Ridge. Flat-lying Ellensburg Fm sediments are pentrated by a number of sheeted dikes sourced in the overlying Touchet Beds. Diking appears related to flooding and deposition of the Touchet Beds, not folding and faulting of the Ellensburg. The dikes do not rise from a liquefied source bed. They post-date deposition of the Ellensburg, post-date some of the tilting, and were filled from the top by Touchet Bed sediment.
Dikes in the Miocene-Pliocene Ringold Formation (Pasco Basin)
Sheeted clastic dikes are rare in deformed Miocene and Pliocene sediments exposed near Yakima Fold Belt faults. The vast majority of Ellensburg and Ringold Formation exposures in the region are free of clastic dikes or other features that might be called "seismites".
Thin dikes do exist in the Ringold and deserve mention. A sparse set of thin, mud-filled dikes intrudes certain fine-grained portions of the Ringold Fm (9.5-3.4 Ma). The vertical dikes are rarely thicker than a notebook or longer than a meter. They are sourced and entirely contained within Pliocene strata (upper Ringold) and are often associated with a hard white claystone (thickened tephra?). These dikes are limited to specific outcrops andhave not been studied in detail to date. I have also documented a few thin, short dikes in steeply-tilted rocks at three localities along the Saddle Mountains front and at other low-elevation locations in the vicinity where the sediments lie flat.
I interpret these as incidental features typical of sandy sedimentary deposits near fault zones worldwide. They do not form networks. Their fills are unsheeted. They are only locally present and confined to specific strata. They bear little resemblance to Touchet-type dikes; dikes in the Ringold formed by a different mechanism.
Small dikes in Ringold sediments at Saddle Mountains. A few small white dikes descend into a red, sandy alluvial fan gravel that overlies Elephant Mountain basalt. Nearly identical dikes in same strata occur at Smyrna Bench.
Small dikes in Ringold Fm. Small, single-fill dikes in a white claystone at Othello Canal. I examine these dikes in a YouTube video Pliocene Clastic Dikes at Othello Canal.
Columbia River Road. Dikes from above penetrate tens of meters into the Ringold Formation.
Small dikes in Ellensburg Fm in eastern Yakima Valley. A thin clastic dike, truncated at its top, cuts fluvial-lacustrine strata at Houghton Rd north of Sunnyside, WA. These quiet water sediments closely resemble those at Snipes Mountain (mapped as Miocene Ellensburg or undifferentiated Miocene) and at many locations in Pasco Basin (mapped as Pliocene Ringold). The contact between Ellensburg and Ringold is not well defined.
Do All Clastic Dikes Indicate Paleoseismicity?
Because clastic dikes are commonly found in deformed sediments in earthquake-prone regions of the world, data on dikes are often included in post-quake damage assessments. Standardized methods for measuring and mapping liquefaction features have been developed by USGS, state geological surveys, and consultants (Gohn and others, 1984; Atwater, 1994; Obermeier, 1996, 2009; Peterson and Madin, 1998; McCalpin, 2009; Holtzer and others, 2011). Field measurements including dike width, length, distance from epicenter, etc. can help delineate the spatial extent of strong shaking (i.e., shake intensity maps). The value of such maps largely depends on the size of the dataset. A small number of measurements or measurements collected within a small area (i.e., a trench) have low value because they lack statistical power and may under-represent the wider effects of shaking.
Misinterpretation of features and field relationships can also be a problem, especially for inexperienced staff or where freatures are poorly exposure. In the absence of abundant, quality exposures in an unfamiliar region, investigators should be especially aware of their priors. The assumption that all clastic dikes form by liquefaction and are earthquake-caused, has led some to incorrectly interpret certain clastic dikes are seismites.
In 2017, an international conference was convened to coordinate proper reporting on seismites in sedimentary sequences. The conference emphasized the need for caution (Feng, 2017). It seems “seismite” (Seilacher, 1969; Montenat and others, 2007; Van Loon, 2014) has for some time been applied too liberally in journal articles to features of nonseismic or ambiguous origin, making reexamination of many "classic" seismite localities necessary. Participating geoscientists reattributed many "classic" features to nonseismic triggers, most commonly to rapid sedimentation and overloading (Moretti and Van Loon, 2014; Shanmugam, 2016 and references therein). The following three quotes capture the feelings of participants:
“Nonseismic events can create structures that are virtually indistinguishable from seismically- eformed sediments, or seismites. Therefore, paleoseismologists must correlate candidate seismites over regions and rule out nontectonic origins before concluding that an earthquake occurred.”
– L.B. Grant
“A great progress has been made in researches [SIC] of soft-sediment deformation structures (SSDs) and seismites in China. However, the research thought was not open-minded. About the origin of SSDs, it was almost with one viewpoint, i.e., almost all papers published in journals of China considered the beds with SSDs as seismites. It is not a good phenomenon.”
– Z-Z. Feng
“At present, there are no criteria to distinguish...soft-sediment deformation structures formed by earthquakes from SSDs formed by the other 20 triggering mechanisms...the current practice of interpreting all SSDs as “seismites” is a sign of intellectual indolence.”
– G. Shanmugam
J Harlan Bretz on clastic dikes. Bretz dike not pay much attention to the dikes. However, he describes aseismic deformation in his field notes on the Touchet Beds (August 14, 1923; July 15, 1929) and in one publication (Bretz, 1928b, Fig. 9 photo above). See Footnote 11.
Sheeted clastic dikes in the Channeled Scablands are Pleistocene phenomena.
Sheeted dikes originate in Pleistocene deposits, including both “ancient” flood deposits (>35 ka, pre-Late Wisconsin) and younger Missoula Flood deposits (<35 ka, Late Wisconsin). The vertically sheeted, wedge-shaped structures number in the tens of thousands (a conservative estimate), are visually distinctive, and occur only within the boundaries of the Ice Age floodways. They penetrate to many meters depth, including to basalt bedrock. Various basalt flows and interbeds, where truncated by flood unconformities and/or overlain by flood, deposits also contain dikes - whatever flow is exposed to overland floods.
Maximum Width Method is Inappropriate for Composite (Sheeted) Clastic Dikes
Liquefaction-extent maps prepared in the wake of damaging earthquakes are based on point data collected in the field, specifically the widths and locations of surface rupture, clastic dikes, water spouts, sand boils, and related phenomena. Liquefaction dikes in the subsurface feed sand boils erupting at the surface. If cross section exposures are available, the width of the widest feeder dike can be recorded at each site and the point data contoured or otherwise summarized cartographically. The “maximum width method” is based on the notion that seismic shaking is most intense near an epicenter and drops off with distance away as energy attenuates. Larger dikes are predicted near the epicenter where ground acceleration is greater, shaking more intense, higher pore pressures in wet sediment were generated, and more lateral spreading occurred. Relationships between maximum width of liquefaction-type feeder dikes and shaking intensity are well established (Ambraseys, 1991; Galli, 2000; Zhong and others, 2022).
The most well known example of liquefaction dike mapping is the New Madrid Seismic Zone located in the lower Mississippi River Valley (Fuller, 1912; Boyd and Schumm, 1995; Obermeier and others, 2005). Magnitude 7.2–8.2 quakes with Modified Mercalli Intensities >VIII struck the region in 1811-1812, toppling structures, disrupting transportation networks, and changing local hydrology. Two earlier events are now recognized as well. Sand blows vented wet sediment to the surface over hundreds of square kilometers. Remnants of surface-vented sand are still visible on aerial photos. Obermeier (1998), using data from feeder dikes exposed in creek cutbanks, successfully demonstrated liquefaction features can be used to determine the approximate location of a paleoepicenter.
Obermeier's mapping of liquefaction features (sand blows) in the New Madrid Seismic Zone.
Black circles correspond to the maximum widths of sand blow feeder dikes produced by earthquakes in the lower Mississippi Valley near the confluences of the Wabash and Ohio Rivers (Obermeier, 1998). Dashed ovals approximate the damage halos of past quakes. Obermeier recognizes three size categories: <15 cm, 15-50 cm, >50 cm.
But the USGS's methodology for measuring sand blow feeder dikes (liquefaction dikes) is inappropriate for sheeted, downward-pinching clastic dikes (Columbia Basin injectites). The maximum width method assumes dikes are single-fill structures formed during single earthquakes; dike width scales with the strength of shaking. Width captures the total amount of lateral spreading that occurred during a shaking event. By contrast, the width of a sheeted dike reflects the total amount of widening, which may have occurred during multiple events separated by decades to millennia. Sheeted dikes grow incrementally by multiple injection/widening events that can be separated by long hiatuses. The two data sets describe two entirely different phenomena, likely different failure modes (hydraulic fracture vs. fluidized escape), different triggers, and different near-surface saturation levels (water table position). The appropriate measurement, one that provides an apples-to-apples comparison, would be to record the width of the widest feeder dike at a site (single-fill structures) vs. the width of the widest individual sheet in any dike at a site (sheeted structures).
Comparing Crust Beneath Columbia Basin vs. New Madrid The seismic potential of faults in the Columbia Basin (<M 7) and faults in the New Madrid Seismic Zone (>M 7) are not comparable. The New Madrid is an ancient failed rift in crystalline basement (deep, steep faults in strong crust). The Columbia Basin is a young back-arc flood basalt province resting atop Tertiary sedimentary-volcanic sequences formed outboard of the cratonic margin (shallow, low-angle compressional faults in young, weak material). Surficial sediments in the New Madrid region are Holocene floodplain deposits of maor rivers - the Mississippi, Ohio, and Wabash. The New Madrid is a wet, low-relief, alluvial plain and has been so since at least the late Pleistocene. The water table resides near the surface throughout the region where remnants of vented sand is found (Holocene sand blows). Surficial sediments in Columbia Basin, by contrast, are a mix of Ice Age megaflood deposits, late Pleistocene loess, alluvial fan deposits, and minor Holocene alluvium that is typically confined to narrow, low order stream valleys. Large rivers of the region flow mostly in deep, bedrock-confined channels and gorges. The water table lies at significant depth beneath a thick vadose zone in backflooded valleys containing Touchet Beds. In stark contrast to the fertile Mississippi Valley, the Channeled Scablands were an agricultural wasteland prior to the construction of Grand Coulee Dam and its vast network of irrigation canals. Even in the slightly wetter Palouse Hills, dryland wheat farming is supported by soils that lie well above local water tables; the water holding capacity of Palouse silt, not shallow groundwater, supports crops.
Undeformed Holocene alluvium. Thick sections of Holocene alluvium (>4m) like this in the Dry Creek Valley near Walla Walla show no evidence of strong seismic shaking (surface ruptures, liquefaction, sand blows, convoluted bedding, seismites) despite favorable grainsize distributions and saturation levels. Thickened Mazama ash, a constituent of Holocene loess, is conspicuous in dozens of roadcuts, railcuts, and cutbanks in the Walla Walla Valley. If present, convoluted bedding, fault offsets, and fluidization structures would have long ago been identified by local geologists, farmers, and soil scientists given the sheer number of excellent exposures and the strong visual contrast between the bright white ash and darker alluvium. Holocene deformation, if present, is not widespread in south-central Washington. It is anomalous. Photo location is the intersection of Harvey Shaw Rd and Dague Rd along Dry Creek ~8 km north of Walla Walla, WA. Mapped Quaternary faults nearby include Wallula Fault Zone (21 km away), Hite Fault (33 km away), Kooskooskie Fault (23 km away), and Promontory Point Fault (6 km away). Photographed in June 2021.
Undeformed late Pleistocene-Holocene alluvium. Thick alluvial fills along Willow Creek near LaCrosse, WA are undeformed.
Undeformed late Pleistocene deposits and Holocene alluvium. Ice Age flood, reworked colluvium, and lake deposits capped by younger alluvium and Mazama Ash are well exposed along Latah Creek west of Spokane, WA. Lake beds are prone to failure along the creek, but the section remains largely undeformed. I've seen nothing resembling continuously-deformed layers (i.e., seismites). Local folds (centimeter to meter scale) are occassionally encountered. These are rollups formed where coarse bedload gravels override finer grained sediments (high energy backflood flows). Accessible cutbank exposures away from noisy Hwy 195 (near Qualchan G.C.) can be found to the south along quieter Hangman Valley Rd (near Hangman Valley G.C.).
Shaking Intensity-Liquefaction Distance Relationships Fail
Shallow, intraplate faults in the study area are believed capable of producing magnitude ~6.5 earthquakes and MMI VII–VIII shaking (Lidke and others, 2003). However, sheeted clastic dikes sourced in Pleistocene sediments are found at distances far beyond the 100–125 km outer limit for soft sediment deformation established by Galli (2000) and Zhong and others (2022).
- An epicenter placed at Wallula Gap (Wallula Fault Zone) is located >285 km from large dikes near Kettle Falls, WA.
- An epicenter at Burbank, WA (Umtanum–Gable Mountain Fault) is >260 km from large dikes in Lewiston Basin, ID.
- An epicenter in the Blue Mountains (Hite Fault) is >265 km from large dikes near Granger, WA in the western Yakima Valley.
- An epicenter placed near Arlington, OR (Arlington–Shutler Fault Zone) is >230 km from dikes in the central Willamette Valley, OR.
- An epicenter placed at Smyrna, WA (Saddle Mountains Fault) is 225 km from large dikes at Kettle Falls, 205 km from Tammany Creek, ID, 135 km from Cecil, OR, and 120 km from Bridgeport Hill, WA.
- An epicenter placed at Wyeth, OR (Mount Hood Fault Zone) is 250 km from large dikes at Warden, WA, 375 km from Lewiston, ID, and 395 km from Latah Creek, WA.
- An epicenter placed at Spencer Canyon near Entiat, WA (unnamed fault zone) is >210 km from large dikes at Touchet, WA.
Magnitude–distance curves.
Curves from six large liquefaction studies were compiled by Galli (2000) from several continents and by Zhong and others (2022) using data from China. The Zhong study builds on Qiao and others (2017). They show a strong relationship between earthquake magnitude and the distance away from an epicenter at which liquefaction features should be expected to form. Faults in the study area are believed capable of generating quakes as large as magnitude 7.0, which corresponds with an epicentral distance limit of approximately 125-150 km. Many large dikes in the study area are found at distances greater than 125 km away from Yakima Fold Belt structures, the Hite fault, the Arlington–Shutler fault zone, and the Wallula fault zone. Figure redrawn from Galli (2000).
Sedimentary Evidence of Paleoseismicity East of the Cascades is Weak
If the dikes in the Channeled Scablands are the products of seismic shaking, then one (or more) of the Yakima Fold Belt structures would be a likely candidate(s). However, the dikes are distributed over too large an area for a single YFB fault to be the culprit. If one or more YFB structures (i.e., Saddle Mountains Fault) acted as the trigger, then a recurrent record of seismic shaking would be evident in nearby exposures of Miocene, Pliocene, Pleistocene, and Holocene strata, not just in Pleistocene strata within scabland floodways. Thick Holocene sections in particular, where evidence of strong shaking should be widespread and best preserved, are plentiful and accessible throughout the study area. Likewise, steeply-dipping and faulted Neogene sediments at Toppenish Ridge (i.e, Tule Rd gravel pit on the Yakama Reservation), at Saddle Mountains, at O'Sullivan Dam, and bluffs west of Sentinel Gap should host numerous dikes and other seismites. Measured sections through folded and flat-lying Neogene sediments alike (i.e., Lindsey and others, 1996; Staisch and others, 2021) should contain evidence of liquefaction. Seismites should be most plentiful in roadcuts, cutbanks, and railcuts near the largest mapped faults and should decrease in size and abundance with distance.
Saddle Mountains Fault in the Lower Crab Creek Valley.
Several excellent exposures of sedimentary interbeds between tilted basalt flows (Elephant Mountain seen here) are found along the Saddle Mountains front. None contain sheeted clastic dikes. The thin, light-colored fractures in the photo at right are not liquefaction features, but bleached shear bands, structures common in deformed sandstones worldwide.
Fault zone investigations have likewise failed to reveal a pattern of strong seismic shaking in Eastern Washington:
- The Stateline earthquake of 1936, centered in the Walla Walla Valley - the quake often used as evidence for strong shaking on OWL faults - was a sub-magnitude 6.0 event that formed no sheeted dikes and caused no damage to speak of beyond its epicenter, the tiny community of Umapine, OR.
- The Hite Fault, located in the Blue Mountains southeast of Walla Walla, appears no longer seismically active. I am aware of no reports of liquefaction associated with the Hite Fault.
- Strong shaking produced by a Puget Sound fault or by the Cascadia Subduction Zone are far-fetched explanations for the dikes in Eastern Washington. Shaking generated west of the Cascade divide, would be greatly attenuated before reaching the Columbia Basin (Peterson and others, 2011; Wood and others, 2014). No evidence of megathrust shaking at 1700 AD (Atwater and others, 2005) is recognized in Eastern Washington. Likewise, no evidence of the 1918 Vancouver Island M 7.2, 1946 Vancouver Island M 7.5, 1949 Olympia M 6.7, or 2001 Nisqually M 6.8 is known.
- Widespread liquefaction was not reported following the 1872 North Cascades earthquake (~M 7) and its many aftershocks (Milne, 1956; Sherrod and others, 2015; Brocher and others, 2018) despite vast quantities of silty-sandy glaciofluvial and glaciolacustrine sediments in terraces along the Columbia, Wenatchee, Methow, Okanogan, and Sanpoil Rivers. Stories about damaging earthquakes and news onother natural disasters came from local newpapermen (see Brocher and others, 2018, Appendix B), whose job it was then and is today to amplify the spectacle and sell papers. Their reports should be taken with a grain of salt. The 1872 quake caused water spouts, ground cracks, landslides, and collapsed cabin roofs according to reports (Washington Stadard Newspaper 11 Jan 1873; Coombs and others, 1976). Let's put those reports in historical context. Wenatchee in 1872 was in every way a frontier town. Residents - all 100 of them - were 20 years away from their town being platted. The light bulb and the telephone had not yet been invented. Ulysses S. Grant was President. Washington, Idaho, Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, New Mexico, and Arizona were not yet states. Chelan County didn't exist. Just 6 rudimentary seimographs monitored ground motion for the entire PNW region, including parts of British Columbia, until the mid-1960s.
- The notion that widespread liquefaction east of the Cascades could be attributed to large, distant quakes through a "bounce of seismic of energy from the Moho" (i.e., Obermeier, 1988, p. 250) is flatly rejected.
- A long history of strong seismic shaking has not been recognized in a.) the hundreds of borehole cores logged at the Hanford Site, b.) in dozens of measured sections at White Bluffs by several geologists, c.) in cores from alpine lakes in the Cascades and Okanogan Highlands, d.) in ODP cores off WA and OR, e.) in Ellensburg/Thorp/Latah Fm sections in Kittitas, Yakima, and Naches Valleys, f.) in Neogene sediments in the Dalles-Umatilla syncline, and g.) in thick sedimentary interbeds in the CRBs across the region. The region's paleoseismic signal remains largely unrecognized in the sediments of the region despite more than a century of geological investigation by federal agencies, Washington Geological Survey, mapping geologists, university researchers, and others.
Evidence of strong shaking in central Washington is a hypothesis currently being tested through trenching and other investigations by USGS. Their work is far from complete. Early reports are mixed regarding the actual threat Quaternary faults pose to citizens and infrastructure in the region. Some reports contain significant errors (i.e., Angster and others, 2020) or interpretations disputed by collaborators (Coppersmith and others, 2014). Much of the USGS's work is trustworthy, capably handled by seasoned field staff. Nevertheless, no association between YFB seismicity and sheeted clastic dikes has been established to date through trenching or any other method. Instead, non-seismic factors appear to control where, when, and how the dikes formed (see Footnote 6). It is entirely plausible that the YFB ridges rose in conjunction with dozens of modest earthquakes (~M ~6.0).
Lost exposure.
About 15 Touchet Beds overlie a thick bar gravel in the Snake River canyon near Lyons Ferry. John Whitmer photo (WGS Archive #03144).
Nonseismic Analogs to Columbia Basin Dikes
Examples of sheeted, per descendum clastic dikes that closely resemble those in Columbia Basin. In all cases, overloading, rapid sedimentation, and hydrofracture were involved. Sheeted, wedge-shaped dikes intrude muddy deposits beneath tidewater glaciers in Sweden (Von Brunn and Talbot, 1986; Jolly and Lonergan, 2002; Le Heron and Etienne, 2005; Phillips and others, 2013) and in sediments of alpine glacial lakes (Sutherland and others, 2022). Sheeted dikes intrude lahar deposits on the side of an Aleutian volcano in Alaska (Herriott and others, 2014). Dikes formed by hydrofracture propagate downward and laterally out of marine turbidites into channel levees and distal deepwater fan-lobe complexes (Braccini and others, 2008; Cobain and others, 2016). Wedge-shaped sand dikes descend from the base of debris flow deposits into the underlying sandstone at Black Dragon Canyon in the San Rafael Swell, UT (Author's field notes, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dikes_in_black_dragon_canyon_UT.JPG).
Sheeted dikes at Mount Spurr, Alaska.
Sheeted dikes with all the characteristics of Touchet-type dikes discovered by Herriott (2014) in sandy lahar deposits on the side of an Aleutian volcano. Rapid deposition, surface loading, wet over dry sediments, and hydraulic fracturing involved. Image courtesy of Herriott.
Sheeted dikes in a glacial setting. Descending "laminated dikes" at Voss, Norway. Laminations formed by "a repetitive process operating during formation of these types of dikes" (Mangerud and Skreden, 1972; Larsen and Mangerud, 1992).
Field Work Matters
When working on clastic dikes in earthquake country, field projects should be appropriately scaled and employ methods matched to the geologic setting.
Clastic dikes in sedimentary sequences can be ambiguous They do not necessarily require earthquakes to form. In fact, sedimentary dikes are reported in a wide variety of geological settings where nontectonic triggers operate (Shanmugam, 2016). Lessons from California or the Mississippi Valley may not apply. Dikes are threshold features that, if interpreted one way, may brand a landscape as hazardous and unfit for human occupation and industrial development. Interpreted another way, the same dikes become Ice Age relicts of little importance to anyone other than academics and the odd (really odd) megaflood enthusiast. When anchored by evidence gathered at the outcrop, investigations into the origin of clastic dikes tilt toward a correct interpretation. Lab work, office-generated theories, and probability models serve the geoscience community and society best when they are rooted in and remain subordinate to field data.
Careful, comprehensive field work that involves a sufficient number of observations (measurements, samples) and a study area scaled to the geological phenomenon under investigation should be de rigueur. Slothful reporting on clastic dikes and other features highlighted by Shanmugan (2015), shoddy work, and methods successfully developed in one region, but uncritically applied to another (i.e., maximum width method on sheeted dikes) are unacceptable practices.
Project planning is the responsibility of the paleoseismologist. Paleoseismology is primarily a field-based discipline focused on determining the timing and effects of prehistoric earthquakes. Data gathered in the course of a paleoseismic investigation (fault slip rates, event dates, and shaking effects) are critical inputs to building codes, hazard planning documents, and land use policies. Data collected in the field inform and often drive policymaking. Unlike technical trench logs and tables of recurrence probabilities, maps constructed from field data are easily understood by technical and non-technical audiences alike. They are uniquely influential and readily migrated into land use policy documents, which tend to persist for decades.
Distances from an assumed epicenter (Wallula Gap) and dike-bearing outcrops in the Channeled Scablands.
Distances from outcrops containing clastic dikes (circles) measured from an assumed epicenter at Wallula Gap (Wallula Fault Zone). Most dikes occur within 150 km of the assumed epicenter, but many occur at distances far beyond limits established by Galli (2000) for earthquake-caused liquefaction. Black bars represent the boundaries of subbasins along the Ice Age floodway. Subbasin count, at bottom of figure, is a proxy for outcrops availability. Outcrops are more numerous at shorter distances because most slackwater basins and deposits are located near Wallula Gap. Also, roadcuts, railcuts, and streamcuts in slackwater deposits are, in general, larger and more numerous in southeastern Washington, where several rivers converge. Dikes are most abundant in exposures immediately upstream and downstream of Wallula Gap, though large dikes commonly occur in distant exposures. Subbasins: CC = Crab Creek Valley, GT = Gorge Tributary valleys downstream of Wallula Gap to The Dalles, LB = Lewiston Basin, OK = Okanogan Valley, PB = Pasco Basin, RP = Rathdrum Prairie, QB = Quincy Basin, SR = Snake River Valley, TV = Tucannon River Valley, UB = Umatilla Basin, UC = Upper Columbia River Valley, WC = Willow Creek Valley, WW = Walla Walla Valley, WV = Willamette Valley, YV = Yakima Valley.
Same dikes hundreds of kilometers apart. One of several large Touchet-type clastic dikes in the Upper Columbia River region (part of Ice Age floodway), more than 285 km north of Wallula Fault Zone. Lake Roosevelt near Kettle Falls, WA.
Key Characteristics of Clastic Dikes Assessable in the Field
Three key physical characteristics of clastic dikes, (a) vertical sheeting, (b) taper direction, and (c) truncation by bedding, speak directly to dike origin and are readily assessable in the field.
(a) Vertical Sheeting - Sheeting is the result of repeated fracturing and sediment injection. Dikes in the study area grew in staccato fashion by filling of newly opened fractures by new pulses of sediment. Sheeting in dikes found elsewhere likely records a similar pattern of reinjection along preexisting weaknesses. New sheets erode older ones; rip-ups derived from adjacent bands should be present in abundance. Small packages of parallel sheets, typically up to six or so in the case of study area dikes, commonly crosscut older packages and reveal variations in the way fractures propagate. If new sheets tap progressively younger source beds, small collapses should be present above fractures opening below. At some of my study sites, multiple collapses appear in successive rhythmites, each initiating a dike. Brief periods of dike widening alternate with longer periods of inactivity (hiatus), a pattern that tracks with cyclic filling and spilling by proglacial lakes.
(b) Taper Direction - Taper direction is strongly tied to dike origin and, whether upward or downward, must be assessed correctly, even when exposure is limited. Taper direction reveals how fractures propagate, the mode of fracture, and the orientation of the pressure gradient. Taper often reveals the source of dike fills. Upward-tapering dikes indicate a buried sediment source and correspond with upward fluid escape under a normal pressure gradient. Fluid pressure in the mobilized bed exceeds the confining stress of the overburden. Downward-tapering dikes indicate injection from the surfacewithin an inverted pressure gradient. Sediment sourced at the surface fills descending dikes. Downward-tapering (per descendum) dikes have few triggers. Where formed, the local stratigraphy will commonly contain low-pressure zones, such as openwork gravels or layers of coarse sand with abundant pore space. Such layers are resistant to compaction and too dry to sustain fluid pressure, thus may provide low-resistance pathways that mimic unconfined layers located near the ground surface. Coarse layers, commonly the basal portions of rhythmites, appear to act as efficient pathways that control how fluid-driven fractures propagate in flood-loaded strata.
(c) Truncations - Understanding how dikes are truncated is a key to understanding how many dikes formed. Truncation by bedding contacts or other surfaces is common in Touchet Bed rhythmite sections. Truncations are not just another characteristic in a checklist. Dikes with bedding-truncated tops connect the timing of deposition to the timing of injection. Tops truncated by multiple bedding contacts in a stack of rhythmites (or other strata) are powerful evidence for repeated deformation, reinjection, and dike growth over time.
Flood counts and the development of vertical sheeting in the dikes.
Stacks of rhythmites (Touchet Beds) deposited by Pleistocene megafloods accumulated to different thicknesses in different parts of the Channeled Scabland. Rhythmite counts vary depending on location. The most complete rhythmite sections occur in slackwater basins repeatedly filled by Lake Lewis, Lake Condon, and Lake Allison. Lake Lewis filled the Walla Walla Valley (Waitt, 1980; 1985), Lewiston Basin (Bretz, 1929 field notes; Webster and others 1982), and Tucannon Valley (Smith, 1993). Lake Condon filled the Umatilla Valley (Benito and O'Connor, 2003), Willow Creek Valley (Cooley, 2015), and Sixmile Valley. Lake Allison filled the Willamette Valley (Glenn, 1965). Glacial Lake Columbia filled the Sanpoil Valley (Atwater, 1986), Upper Columbia Valley (Kiver and Stradling, 1982; Hanson and Clague, 2012), Latah Creek Valley (Rigby, 1982; Kiver and Stradling, 1982; Waitt, 1983; Meyer, 1999), and Foster Coulee (Russell, 1893). Rhythmites also occur in the Glacial Priest Lake basin (Walker, 1967; Breckenridge, 1989). The rhythmite count at a site approximates the flood count. All floods flowed through Wallula Gap and slackwater lakes that ponded there were the deepest anywhere in the region (>200m). Consequently, the largest dikes occur in full rhythmite sections in the southern Pasco Basin, eastern Umatilla Basin, and western Walla Walla Valley. Fill band counts (sheet counts) record repeated flood-loading, substrate failure, and sediment injection. Sheet counts (injections) roughly scale with rhythmite counts (flood counts), though a one-sheet-per-flood pattern is not robust. The sheet count data suggest that up to about 10 sheets may form in a given dike during a flood. Local conditions seem to play a role(flow regime, water depth, valley configuration, grainsize, slackwater lake residence time, etc.). Because dikes widen by the addition of new sediment via reinjection, their widest portions occur near the base of rhythmite stacks (lower in the section) rather than near their tops (higher in the section). Dikes can appear to taper upward because newer fills that tapped successively younger flood beds intruded alongside older fills, forming composite injection dikes
Truncated dikes descend from multiple levels. Previous reports that describe dike-bearing sediments at sites located within the Ice Age floodway. Figures redrawn to facilitate an apple-to-apples comparison. Clastic dike geometry simplified for clarity. Not to scale. A.) Walla Walla Valley sites from Spencer and Jaffee (2002). B.) Lind Coulee Archaeological Site from Daugherty (1956). C.) Moxee Mammoth Site stratigraphy from Lillquist and others (2005). D.) Stratigraphy at Hanford's FMEF Site from Bjornstad and others (1990). E.) Rulo Site stratigraphy in northern Walla Walla Valley from Bader and others (2016). A = Alluvium, C = Colluvium, CRB = Columbia River Basalt, DIA = Silt diamict, EG = Exotic-clast bearing gravel, FG = Fanglomerate/Alluvial fan gravel, L = Loess, P = Paleosol, S = Sandy, SCR = Silt-clay rhythmites, TB = Touchet Beds/Hanford Fm.
Silt-sealed Cracks Facilitate Hydrofracture
Sand-propped hydrofractures are commonly used in the petroleum industry to stimulate tight gas reservoirs ("fracking"). Hydrofracturing is induced by shutting in the well bore and using pumps to jack up the fluid pressure inside until the formation yields and fluid-driven fractures propagate outward. Pressurized proppant (sand + water + chemicals) immediately fills the fractures and holds them slightly open, permitting hydrocarbons to flow back to the well.
Silt skins appear to have facilitated hydrofracturing of substrates during megaflooding (rapid loading events). Loading by floodwater raised fluid pressure in the formation. Elevated pressure state that lasted for a period of seconds to minutes. Shallow natural weaknesses such as frost cracks, soil macropores, burrows, and joints provide nucleation planes for new fractures. During flooding, some of the weaknesses became fractures that opened a few centimeters and were rapidly filled by sediment. Dewatering (leakoff) forms a silt skin at the dike wall. The entering water-sediment slurry (natural proppant) was sourced from the base of the overriding flood. The skin-sealed crack behaved as a pressure vessel. Continued loading of the sealed fracture raised pore fluid pressures (Pf) inside. The point at which fluid pressure exceeded the confining strength of the formation (Pf > 03), breakout occurred, propagating the fracture tip, and a forming dike in the 01–02 plane (vertical). As the fluid pressure equilibrates to the confining pressure (Pf = 03), the fracture tip halts, the crack completely fills, and pressure begins to build again if flood load is still present. Each breakout causes a forward jump of the fracture tip and temporarily relieves fluid pressures in fractures (volume increase, pressure decrease). This load-crack-fill-seal cycle is responsible for the dikes’ vertically sheeted fabric.
The direction of fracture propagation appears controlled, in part, by the orientation of older sheets and bedding contacts (weakness planes), in part by the vertically-oriented water load, and in part by the orientation of the local fluid pressure gradient during flood loading (downward-tapering dike = inverted pressure gradient). In sand blow systems, by contrast, the pressure gradient is normal and decreases upward, toward the ground surface (free face). Sand blow feeder dikes are filled with sediment escaping from a fluidized layer at depth and pinch upward (normally-oriented pressure gradient).
Diking within a flood seems to occur at two different times. One, at initial onrush of floodwater. Two, during slackwater. Gravelly or sandy dikes are likely produced by the first. Silty-sandy dikes are likely produced by the second. Dike injection in the Touchet Beds appears to be primarily a slackwater phenomenon due to the necessary combination of silt deposition (lower-velocity flow), overloading (deep water), and off-channel preservation (low erosion).
Formation of sheeted dike fills.
Fluid pressure-crack volume cycling at the scale of the fracture (nearfield scale) explains vertical sheeting in clastic dikes during a loading event. Time steps 1 through 12 in the pressure-time curve correspond with crack tip locations in the illustration below. During rapid overloading, dike growth (cracking and filling) corresponds with pressure-volume cycling where fluid pressure remains between the minimum and maximum principal stress values. Fluid-driven fracture is also responsible for producing slender, descending, sheeted dikes in other geologic settings where rapid overloading has occurred (lahar, glacier, debris flow, etc.). While the general principles of hydraulic fracture were well established in practice and in the literature prior to WWII, the development of sheeting in clastic dikes by hydraulic fracture, as I've illustrated here, is new and published here for the first time.
Sheeting and cyclic pressure-volume pulses.
Another depiction of fluid-driven fracture and the growth of sheeting during a single flood (single hydrofracture event). The cross sections correspond to the gray shaded portion of the pressure-time curve. During the hydraulic fracture period, new fractures form and fill, but not all at once. Here I show 4 pulses corresponding to 4 episodes of diking, which manifest as new single-fill dikes (1a, 2b, 4a) or additional sheets (2a, 3abc, 4bc). Either way, we get rapid, yet incremental growth of the dike network (eg., total volume of the fracture network) during a flood-loading event. Each time a new fracture opens, sediment circulating at the base of the flood fills it. Floodwater loading is some combination of the inital overland flood, backfloods, and slackwater lakes. In most large exposures dikes descend from at least two flood beds. Repeated flooding and repeated diking is a consistent pattern observed in the Channeled Scablands.
Near field and far field fracture.
I came up with this concept to explain how loads imposed over a broad area (far field flood load) relate to localized deformation (near field clastic dikes). The fracking/leak-off test framework captures most of the important elements. Leak-off begins once fractures begin to propagate, which is not well show in fracture propagation diagrams like this.
Relevant equations. Elastic Pressure (Pe) describes properties of the fractured material. Specifically, the stress perpendicular to a crack required to keep it open, where h is crack width, L is crack length, G is the shear modulus, and v is Poisson's ratio. Source Pressure (Pr) is fluid pressure of the source, considered here to be the pressure of the sediment-water slurry at base of a megaflood or slackwater lake, measured at the opening (top) of the crack. Source Pressure is assumed to be constant during diking. E is Young's modulus of the host sediment or rock, delta p is the density difference between host and the injected fill, g is gravity, Q is the volumetric flux of material injected into the crack, and u is the average injection velocity. Viscous Pressure Drop (Pv) is the pressure change along its length from crack opening to crack tip, where n is the slurry viscosity. Fracture Pressure (Pf) is the pressure required to propagate the crack tip forward, where Kc is the critical fracture toughness. Hydrostatic Pressure (buoyancy) is ignored for near-surface sedimentary dikes at atmospheric temperatures. The equations above are basic elements of undergraduate-level courses in Fracture Mechanics. Good YouTube channels for learning include Nicholas Espinoza, Scott Ramsay, Taylor Sparks, and others.
Evaluating Proposed Origins
Proposed origins can be evaluated based on data and observations collected from hundreds of dike-bearing outcrops within the floodway and dike-free formations beyond the floodway margin.
Origin Hypothesis #1: Desiccation - Little evidence supports a desiccation origin. Dike geometry, distribution, size, and internal sedimentary characteristics are fundamentally at odds with an origin involving the passive infilling of meters-deep, open-standing mudcracks.
Origin Hypothesis #2: Ground ice - Ice wedge casts are wedge-shaped bodies of sediment common to permafrost lowlands of North America, Europe, and Asia. Ice wedges grow by seasonal freeze-thaw action and coalesce to form conspicuous polygonal networks (plan view). Many display vertically-laminated fills (Lachenbruch, 1962; Romanovskiy, 1973). Their occurrence at middle latitudes is far less common (Horber, 1949; Dylik, 1966; Burbidge and others, 1988; Stone and Ashley, 1992; Demoulin, 1996). Alwin and Scott (1970), Lupher (1944), and Black (1979) interpreted clastic dikes in the Pasco Basin as fossil ice wedge casts based on their arrangement in polygonal networks, sheeted fills, and age. While the dikes in some ways resemble ice wedges of the modern Arctic, considerable evidence argues against a ground ice origin. The Columbia Basin is located at the transition between maritime and continental climate zones. Its average elevation is quite low. No periglacial evidence is know in the Blue Mountains of SE Washington. Cirque elevation contours project far above the crests of all Yakima Fold Belt ridges (Pierce, 2003, Fig. 1). The Basin lies significantly west of the relict permafrost zone in the Rocky Mountains (French, 2018). Small wedges that formed on exposed surfaces between drainings of Glacial Lake Missoula deposits in much colder areas of western Montana (Chambers, 1984; Chambers and Currey, 1989; Levish, 1997; Hanson and others, 2012; Hanson, 2013; Smith, 2014, 2021) are fundamentally different than clastic dikes described in this report. Periglacial wedges akin to those found in the Lemhi Range of Idaho (Butler, 1984; D.R. Butler written communication), the Owl Cave-Wasden Site on the Snake River Plain (Dort, 1968; Butler, 1969), terrace gravels near Lewistown, MT (Schafer, 1949), and prairie soils east of Glacier National Park (unpublished photos and field notes by the author) are not known in Washington. Fully-developed fossil ice wedge networks in high-elevation basins of Wyoming (Grasso, 1979; Mears, 1981, 1987; Nissen and Mears, 1990; Munn and Spackman, 1991; Dillon and Sorenson, 2007) are unheard of in the Pacific Northwest.
Wedges in the Glacial Lake Missoula basin. Numerous small wedges like this descend from several horizons in Glacial Lake Missoula "varve" beds exposed at Rail Line (A,B), Jocko River (C), Crow Dam, and Garden Gulch sections (Chambers, 1984; Chambers and Currey, 1989; Levish, 1997; Hanson and others, 2012; Hanson, 2013; Smith, 2014, 2021). These structures formed during lowstand periods (shoalings) in the lake basin and resemble wedges commonly found in periglacial regions. A combination of desiccation and shallow ice wedging are likely.
The terminus of the Cordilleran Ice Sheet is well mapped across northern Washington (Porter and others, 1983; Atwater 1986; Cheney, 2016), but a corresponding periglacial zone remains loosely delineated. Murton (2020) delineates a conspicuously narrow permafrost zone south of the Okanogan Lobe; the southern limit of permafrost occupied essentially the same position. Abundant relict periglacial features are found in a 200 km-wide zone south of the Laurentide Ice Sheet (Pewe, 1983; Clark and Ciolkosz, 1988), but few such features are reported south of the Cordilleran Ice Sheet (Orme, 2002; French and Millar, 2013; French, 2017).
The landscape never supported a tundra plant community. Tundra biomes are identified by their lack of trees. Tundra plants are adapted to cold conditions, short growing seasons, and shallow rooting zones limited by shallow bedrock or permafrost. Pleistocene mammoth were nourished by steppe-grassland forage (Fry, 1969; Last and Barton, 2014). While pollen data from Columbia Basin lake cores indicate the presence of some cold-tolerant, low-growing species, the region never lost its tree component (Blinnikov and others, 2002; Whitlock and Brunelle, 2006).
Ice wedge forms. Numerous studies have been published on ice wedge and ice wedge casts in Arctic regions (Lachenbruch, 1962; Pewe, 1973; Romanovskij, 1973; Mears, 1987; Yershov, 1998; Bockheim, 2002; Murton, 2020). Columbia Basin was never glaciated and barely periglacial during the coldest parts of the Pleistocene. Its clastic dikes are not fossil ice wedge casts, despite their vertical sheeting and speculation by Lupher (1944), Alwin (1970), and Black (1979).
No mention of relict ground ice features, frost stirring, or gelifluction is made in NRCS Soil Surveys for the Colville Indian Reservation, Okanogan County (NRCS, 2010), Chelan County (USDA, 1975), Douglas County (NRCS, 2008), Grant County (USDA, 1984), or Lincoln County (USDA, 1981). Palouse loess and scabland deposits contain abundant phytoliths, rodent burrows, and insect burrows - features incompatible with perennial ground ice. Rodents recolonized the landscape between floods throughout the Pleistocene. Frost shattering in Columbia River Basalt, exposed over thousands of square kilometers, was not unusually intense (Pidwirny, 2006). Thick loess and mima mounds, often erroneously attributed to periglacial processes, are not diagnostic of periglacial conditions. Identical silt mounds are found from central Mexico to the High Arctic and certain mounds in south-central Washington are clearly Holocene age. Mima mounds indicate that its a windy place, little else.
Late Pleistocene conditions in the Columbia Basin were not periglacial as some suggest (i.e., O'Geen and Busacca, 2001). At its coldest, the landscape was "tundra-like" (Cooley, 2008) and perhaps best described as a "cold steppe" (Spencer and Knapp, 2010, p. 50) with sagebrush and forest refugia that supported species,
...found in alpine and sub-alpine valleys in the [present-day] Cascade Mountains of Washington...cool-to-cold, moist, open-park conditions...consistent with the presence of continental ice to the north
Soil wedges east of Glacier National Park. These soil wedges formed under periglacial conditions of the Pleistocene east of the Continental Divide (465 km east of Grand Coulee Dam). Wedges like these help define a former ground ice region mapped by Murton (2020) and French (2017). Location is along Hwy 89 between the Two Medicine River and Badger Creek south of Browning, MT. Columbia Basin, though often miserable in January, never suffered Continental cold like this.
Origin Hypothesis #3: Lateral spreading - Lateral spreading requires liquefaction and lateral extension, typically involving blocks of material sliding sideways on a low-angle plane. The figure below shows three scenarios that assume wedge-shaped dikes and a gently sloping ground surface above a thick body of sediment, consistent with the settings in which dense networks of clastic dikes in Eastern Washington are found. The free face, formed by channel incision, accomodates the lateral extension and spreading. The effects of a free face are local; tension fractures form near the bluff edge (within 200m?). Several elements in the model are not present in outcrops. High-relief sediment-filled channels, which create the space required for spreading, are not found in the Touchet Beds. Valley floors, where the largest dikes are found, are broadly compressional in the horizontal plane, not extensional. The floors of slackwater basins are flat. Slopes appear insufficient to translate blocks of sandy sediment sideways, much less downhill. Slide blocks have no reason to form and nowhere to go. Any spreading that did occur was localized along linear bluffs (diking restricted to narrow swaths along former channels). They do not. There is no evidence of widespread liquefaction or block sliding on low-angle surfaces in the dozens of large rhythmite exposures I visited during this study. The dikes do not occupy rubbly zones between slide blocks.
Lateral spreading still popular on Boyer Avenue?
Lateral spreading falls short. Liquefaction does, too.The diagrams above explain why. (A) Channel incision removes support and creates a free face that can facilitate lateral spreading in shoreline bluffs. (B) Seismic shaking can trigger liquefaction in wet, sandy layers at depth resulting in clastic dikes (water escape structures). This involves the mobilization of in situ sediment and venting of a slurry to the surface as sand blows. Broad sheets and "volcanic" sand edifices are formed. (C) A large vertical load imposed by a megaflood (overland flood, backflood, or slackwater lake) increaseds pore fluid pressures in the substrate (sediment or rock), which can initiate hydraulic fracturing. Fractures immediately fill with sediment sourced from the surface (sediment circulating at the base of the flood). Hydraulic fractures initated at the surface propagate downwards. Fractures are propped by the sandy fill to become clastic dikes. Internal sheeting develops during single events (pressure-volume cycling) and over time as new dikes fomred during later flood events merge with older ones. Repeated flooding creates composite clastic dikes.
Origin Hypothesis #4: Rebound following slackwater lake drainage - Ice Age floods imposed considerable loads on the crust. Loads arrived rapidly (overland flood) and in places were sustained over several weeks (slackwater lakes). In the southern Pasco Basin, lake depth exceeded 200m. Crustal rebound would have followed lake drainage. We don't know the amount of depression or if geological effects (deformation) of loading and unloading are preserved in rocks and sediment of the Channeled Scablands. Deformation differ between the two phases of a flood, a.) water moving overland and, b.) slackwater lake. Flooding and backflooding are lumped into the first phase for simplicity. The duration and depth of the overland phase is shorter and shallower than the slackwater phase. 2D modeling indicates overland phase takes place over a few days and the slackwater phase a few weeks. (O'Connell and Denlinger). Deformation may accompany phase a, phase b, or both a and b. Because distinct sedimentologic differences exist between sediment deposited during the overland and slackwater phases, the relative timing of deformation should be apparent in outcrops. For example, if the coarser grained lower portion of a Touchet Bed (overland phase) is folded but the finer grained upper (slackwater phase) remain flatlying, then overland flooding triggered deformation. If clastic dikes formed during both phases, they should be sourced in both lower and upper portions of rhythmites. Either way, post-drainage rebound involves no liquefaction.
Belly up to the bar. Wedge-shaped fractures result from up-bending caused by unloading of floodwater by drainage.
Origin Hypothesis #5: Seismic shaking and liquefaction - Water from fast-moving floods and long-standing slackwater lakes loaded the crust. Floodwater might infiltrate fault zones in some circumstances, causing them to rupture. Whether scabland floods triggered strong earthquakes by vertically stressing the crust or lubricating faults is unknown. If the dikes are the products of flood-induced seismicty, then the mechanism is liquefaction and lateral spreading. No fault has been identified as the likely candidate. Local faults in the Yakima Fold Belt do not appear capable of generating stong enough shaking to cause soft sediments to fluidize at distances well beyond 125 km. Diking occured only during the Pleistocene, not before or since though YFB structures have been active since the Miocene. Megafloods are essentially stochastic eventFlood-triggered rupture is slip independent of the background tectonic stress regime).
Liquefaction is site specific and its interpretation can be tricky (Youd and Garris, 1995; Feng, 2017). The 1700 Cascadia earthquake triggered widespread subsidence and liquefaction in estuarine sediments along the Washington coast (Atwater and others, 2005, 2015). Sandy beds at depth mobilized and vented to the ground surface, forming small volcanic edifices that sometimes coalesced into sheets. In places, the vented sand was covered by sediment delivered inland by tsunami bores. Despite intense shaking, estimated at magnitude 9, clastic dikes in alluvial sediments of the lower Columbia River and Willamette Valley (Dickenson, 1997; Obermeier and Dickenson, 1997) do not closely resemble sand boils, blows, and dikes formed during the 1964 Alaska quake (McCulloch and Bonilla, 1970; Walsh and others, 1995) or the 1811-12 New Madrid quake (Fuller, 1912; Obermeier, 1989, 1998). Atwater (2000) suggests river bank retreat since 1700 may have removed much of the evidence. He also wonders whether the engineering properties of sediments that comprise sand islands vary in ways not anticipated, which might explain discontinuous liquefaction in visually-similar deposits occupying identical positions in the landscape.
In both magmatic and clastic systems, dikes feed eruptions. Clastic dikes described in this article did not.
Origin Hypothesis #6: Flood-generated vibration - Ice Age floods certainly caused a tremendous rumble as they coursed through the Channeled Scablands, likely audible to human and animal occupants of the region. Floods may also have set up a vibratory resonance in surficial sediments, causing them to deform in unusual ways. The dikes may be a product of resonant deformation, though no investigation has been conducted to date. Research into seismic signals generated by extremely large sediment-laden floods is underway at Université de Grenoble-Alpes, France as of Feb 2023 (Kristen Cook, Florent Gimbert, Alain Recking).
Origin Hypothesis #7: Hydraulic fracture triggered by floodwater loading - This is my preferred origin, the evidence for is presented in this article.
Non-seismic triggers. Clastic dikes form in response to rapid sedimentation and overloading. Dikes are widely documented in both seismically-active and low-seismicity areas alike in a variety of geologic environments and deposits. While earthquakes commonly trigger liquefaction and do a produce certain type of clastic dike, dike morphology should be used to determine whether liquefaction was involved. Not all clastic dikes are seismites. Evaluate taper direction, internal sheeting, and the connection to source bed to distinguish one type from another. Figure modified from Shanmugam and others (2016, Figure 16).
Dike-sill-dike. Fluid pressure-driven fracture in unconsolidated granular material is central to the formation of sheeted clastic dikes in the Touchet Beds. Understand how hydraulic fractures initiate and propagate and you understand sheeted diking in the megaflood region. Or don't and continue to flounder about with liquefaction and other outdated explanations unsupported by data. Your choice.
Conclusions
This study documents sheeted dikes throughout a vast inland region located far from the plate margin and swept repeatedly by Ice Age megafloods. Sedimentology, age, structure, and size of the dikes indicate they all share a common origin involving rapid loading, fluid-driven fracture, and downward sediment injection. Slumping and hydrofracture were suspected by earlier workers (Baker, 1973; Pogue, 1998), but not tested. New field data presented here supports both suspicions. I interpret the dikes not as products of strong seismic shaking, but as injectites formed during megaflood events. Enormous loads rapidly imposed on sedimentary and bedrock substrates by catastrophic overland floods caused fractures to propagate downward and immediately fill with sediment sourced at the base of the flood. Dike widths reflect local flood counts and sheeting reflects crack-and-fill cycling during flood events. Reinjection occured during successive floods. Field-observable characteristics distinguish the clastic dikes described here (sheeted, composite, weddge-shaped) from earthquake-triggered liquefaction dikes and related fluidization structure in other regions (i.e., sand blows in the New Madrid Seismic Zone). Clastic dikes in the megaflood region of Washington, Oregon, and Idaho are flood injectites, not seismites.
Author's note - This article expands on one I published in Northwest Geology v. 49 in August 2020. Northwest Geology is published annually by the Tobacco Root Geological Society in conjunction with the TRGS field conference. TRGS is a Montana-based group of geoscience professionals. I update this online version from time to time as new information becomes available. Online version was first posted here 15 Sept 2020.
LAST UPDATED: 17 Sept 2023
Keywords: megafloods, injectite, clastic dike, channeled scablands, missoula floods, washington geology, hydraulic fracture
Footnote *1* Bruce Bjornstad, a retired career Quaternary geologist at Hanford, has, more than any of his PNNL colleagues, mentioned the clastic dikes in his writing, beginning with his university work in the late 1970s and continuing with his recent guidebooks on scabland geology. The primary focus of his professional career was the hydrogeological behaviour of megaflood deposits at the Hanford Nuclear Site and, to a lesser extent, sediments of the Ringold Formation. Though an author of numerous agency reports, Bjornstad has never published original or peer reviewed work on clastic dikes. He is listed as a coauthor on Fecht and others (1999) - a mystifying publication - which I believe was compiled from Fecht's notes. The list of quotes below reveals Bjornstad's drifting opinion on the origin of the dikes through time. What accounts for these changes in opinion remains unclear. Based on their 40 years of writing, I consider Bjornstad and his Hanford colleagues to be casual observers of the dikes. They failed to seriously address the dike problem during their time.
a.) Bjornstad (1980)
"The assemblage of sedimentary structures within the Touchet Beds comparable to turbidites ...suggest periodic, rapid, subaqueous deposition of successive rhythmites by turbidity-like currents created by flood surges during a single flood. Additional evidence suggesting that flood surges rather than separate floods were responsible for rhythmite formation [includes]...the possible association relating clastic dikes with soft sediment deformation."
b.) Bjornstad (1990)
"These dikes are thought to represent dewatering structures that developed during compaction and settling of cataclysmic flood deposits during or soon after floodwaters drained from the Pasco Basin (Bergeron and others, 1987)." "Most clastic dikes, ubiquitous in flood deposits throughout the Pasco Basin, appear to have formed through forcible injection during waning stages of flooding (Black, 1979; WCC, 1981) during this time."
c.) Bjornstad and Teel (1993)
"In the Pasco Basin, clastic dikes are believed to be dewatering structures associated with lake draining following cataclysmic floods." d.) Bjornstad and others (2001)
"The dikes signify soft-sediment deformation during or soon after flooding, perhaps associated with flood-induced seismicity (Cooley and others, 1996; Fecht and others, 1999)."
e.) Bjornstad (2006)
"Clastic dikes formed during or soon after Ice Age flooding, perhaps because of ground shaking during earthquakes...If earthquakes occurred more frequently, we might expect to see more dikes in sequences of flood beds with truncations atop flood beds. But this is not the case..."
f.) Bjornstad and Lanigan (2007)
"Clastic dikes may be the result of ground shaking, which caused the wet sediments to liquefy and flow along paths of weakness down into or up along vertical earthquake-generated cracks in the flood deposits."
Footnote *2*
I have not submitted this manuscript to an academic journal. An earlier version was published in Northwest Geology v. 49 publsihed by the Tobacco Root Geological Society (Cooley, 2020). That manuscript was reviewed and approved by Mike Stickney, Director of Earthquake Studies Office at Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology and Jeff Lonn, Research Geologist also at Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology. Supporting TRGS's excellent annual field conference is far more important to me than whatever prestige I might gain through publication in a traditional journal. Thousands have read this article because it is offered free online. A few dozen might find it if it were tucked behind a journal's paywall. Paying exorbitant page rates so that others might publish my work seems a bit anachronistic, given the tools available today. When the project is complete (I consider everything here draft information), I will likely submit a much leaner version emphasizing the measurement data to Northwest Science Journal for review. Or maybe Whitman College or the Washington Geologic Survey would be interested.
Footnote *3* In our work as Whitman College geology students (Cooley, 1996; Cooley and others, 1996) and follow on studies (Niell and others, 1997; Pogue, 1998), we imprecisely stated that the dikes penetrate from top to bottom through the entire stack of rhythmites, thus were late-flooding and/or post-flooding features. While many dikes do cut from top to bottom through the stack, their internal structure - their vertical sheeting - preserves a more nuanced history of incremental growth coincident with flooding. Vertical sheets of sediment that comprise large dikes (sheets = dikelets = fill bands), are often truncated at their tops by depositional contacts between rhythmites and surfaces within rhythmites that correspond to abrupt changes in flow regime (i.e., upvalley flow, slackwater, downvalley drainage). The dikes do not descend from the top of the rhythmite stack.
As geologists, we think of a "clastic dike" as a single structure, but sheeted dikes are actually compound structures (multiple parts) and many composite structures (new parts added over time). While the "dike" may crosscut an exposure, each sheet (or packages of sheets) traverses only a portion of it. The dikes grew as single fills andsheet packages during single events, and by the addition of new sheets/packages through time, each sourced from a different rhythmite. Dike growth occurred in tandem with Ice Age flood cycles, which punctuated the Pleistocene. As students, we regularly observed truncated sheets (and entire dikes) and were somewhat puzzled by them. We routinely commented to one another about them, photographed them, and sketched various truncation relationships in our field books. We did not, however, fully recognize, much less emphasize the fundamental importance sheet/package truncation plays in dike growth. The dikes are composite structures that grew wider and deeper by reinjection during dozens of catastrophic glacial outburst flood events. Truncated sheets indicate the dikes are not single-event structures injected at the tail end of Missoula flooding (crosscutting features that post-date deposition of all or most floodbeds), as our clumsy early interpretations suggest. Rather, they are long-lived structures that grew in pulses during floods over time. Many large dikes grew by repeated sheet injection over thousands of years. Their growth recurrence interval is the flood interval.
Footnote *4*
The term injection has no directional implication. Injected material may have moved upward, downward, or sideways. Injection describes fracture-filling where wet or slurried material is mobilized and moves into fractured sediment or rock. The usage of injection and injectite in this article is consistent with the relevant geoscience literature (sediments and structure of petroleum reservoirs), not general textbooks on sedimentology and stratigraphy. For example, injection wells move water from the surface to the subsurface. Hydraulic injection involves the lateral propagation of fractures and proppant from the well bore into the formation. Fluidized injection is commonly used to describe both upward-pinching clastic dikes and dikes that were filled from the top.
Footnote *5* Burlingame Canyon is on private land is not accessible to the public without formal permission from landowners.
Footnote *6* In the course of my investigation of calcrete-bearing sediments of Plio-Pleistocene age near Othello, WA, I have not observed evidence of extensive soft sediment deformation consistent with strong, recurrent shaking in the two dozen sections I have described. I recently correlated 28 detailed stratigraphic columns from White Bluffs by Kevin Lindsey (Lindsey and others, 1996 Appendix A), finding no evidence of repeated, widespread shaking. Soft sediment deformation in Pleistocene sediments is plainly syn-depositional. Local deformation and some small, unsheeted fluidization structures in Ringold sediments are found along Saddle Mountains' frontal thrust. Trenching by Michael West and others decades ago documented young faulting higher on the mountain. Steve Reidel never mentioned seismites in reports on Yakima Fold Belt uplifts or in map unit descriptions accomanying his geologic maps maps. Paleoseismic trenches logged by USGS have not shown liquefaction to be widespread.
Footnote *7*
A package of fill bands injected during a single flood. Three fill bands comprise a composite clastic dike in the idealized example above. Each band formed at a slightly different time during a megaflood event. Each fracture opening corresponds with a slightly different flow regime, taps a slightly different stratigraphic level within a rhythmite as it forms, and accesses sediment of a different grainsize. Substitute different flood beds for stratigraphic position within a single bed to explain reinjected dikes in the region. At a larger scale, dike fills reflect the caliber of the sediment available to them. Grainsize in flood deposits is primarily determined by the local flow regime - high-energy channel, backflooded valley, slackwater lake. Since the configuration of most valleys and bedrock water gaps were not radically changed by flood erosion, successive floods produced more or less the same flow regimes and deposited the same grainsizes in the same places over and over. For example, the protected Touchet Valley received mostly medium to fine sand and silt. Dikes there are filled with the same. The Starbuck area, situated close to high-velocity coulees, received more gravelly sand. Dikes there are filled with coarser material. A page from one of my field books.
Footnote *8*
I update this online document from time to time as new information becomes available. This seems a modern way to do things. I prefer to provide updates they come rather than wait for some journal to publish out of date information.
Footnote *9*
If my work informs yours, you should cite this web-based article or the original print article (Cooley, 2020). What is presented here is new work and original work. It is entirely my own. Please include the date you accessed it in your citation.
Online version
Cooley, S.W., date accessed, Sheeted clastic dikes in the megaflood region, WA-OR-ID-MT, https://www.skyecooley.com/single-post/2020/09/15/Sheeted-Clastic-Dikes-in-the-Megaflood-Region
Print version
Cooley, S.W., 2020, Sheeted clastic dikes in the megaflood region, WA-OR-ID-MT in Lonn, J; English, A.; McDonald, K.; Hargrave, P. (editors), Northwest Geology: Journal of the Tobacco Root Geological Society, 45th Annual Field Conference - Geology of the Bitterroot Region and Other Papers v. 49, p. 1-17
Footnote *10*
As recently as 1996 and publication of the Final EIS for tank wast remediation (USDOE/WADOE, 1996), a fundamental lack of understanding regarding the dikes' origin or role in conducting fluids in the subsurface was recognized by geohydrologists at Hanford. Nevertheless, they forward an interpretation,
As with the genesis of [the] clastic dikes, little is known about their hydraulic characteristics...the inferred hydraulic nature of the dikes is that of potentially a minor barrier to flow perpendicular to the dike. The clay content and lack of sand stringer continuity suggest that clastic dikes do not function as preferential flow paths for vertical flow.
Whether the dikes serve as conduits to leaked hazardous liquid waste moving from the surface to subsurface aquifers was partially addressed via an infiltration field experiment on a single, large dike in Touchet Beds at the Hanford Site (Murray and others, 2003). This single experiment generated several other reports by different authors.
A large lithified dike penetrating bedrock at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal in Colorado raised similar concerns decades prior to the Murray report (Miller and others, 1979). Liquid waste introduced deliberately to the suburface was also a problem at RMA. Characterization of clastic dikes as lateral barriers to migrating fluids is an idea developed at RMA and later adopted by Hanford authors, though few geological similarities between dikes in Washington and Colorado exist,
A vertical, tabular body embedded in fine-grained, tuffaceous, calcareous sandstones, siltstones, and shales has been reported at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal. The tabular body has the mineralogy and structure of an igneous dike, but it may also be a clastic dike of sedimentary origin. The possibility that the body may be an igneous dike is of concern to the staff geologists at the Arsenal because it could extend to great depth and be impermeable enough to provide a barrier to laterally migrating ground water or, conversely, it could be relatively permeable and provide an aquifer.
The figure below shows the results from an infiltration test where water-borne dye tracer was introduced to the ground surface via driplines and allowed to spread by gravity into in a.) a large, vertical, sheeted clastic dike, b.) a large, sheeted, subhorizontal sill joined to the dike, and c.) non-dike Touchet Bed sediment surrounding both. Red and yellow areas indicate high reflectance values (high mosture content). Odd how reflectance values and moisture values in the chart below disagree. The figure is redrawn from Murray and others (2001, Fig. 7.33, 7.34). I've reframed their nearly unintelligible artwork, thus presented their study's key finding clearly. Note the sill at left is as wet or wetter (containing and conducting as much or more dye tracer) as the vertical dike at center. The report did not address the intersecting sill.
The Murray study has been regularly referenced in subsequent reports, despite it's obvious design flaws and limited value to geological community or waste remediation managers at Hanford. The study failed to consider flow in the sill and failed to test flow in a multi-dike network, the typical configuration in Columbia Basin. Reading through the project's various interim and final reports leaves one with the impression that it was a start-and-stop affair involving many enthusiastic lab scientists doing something (outdoors!) for the first time. Ten collaborators are listed.
If Hanford geologists actually wanted to find out how clastic dikes conduct fluids leaked from the surface, they would have repeated this experiment at several locations, evaluating flow behavior in multiple configurations of clastic dike-sill networks (i.e., flow in typical dike networks). The Murray team studied one dike at one location. Hardly the rigorous investigation of which our National Labs are capable. But Murray gave it the old College Try, didn't he?
Clastic dike exposed in the Army Loop Road excavation. Grid on lowest tier is 2m wide x 1m high. Blue tent covers infiltration dripline equipment. Photo: Murray team.
Clastic dike and sill are much finer grained than host sediment. Photo: Murray and others, 2003, Fig. 10.
Infiltration in dike, sill, and host sediment after 3 days. Murray and others, 2003, Fig. 16.
Infrared image (top) and a composite photograph of the experiment pit face. Vertical dike is on the left in both images. Sill is the long, dark, horizontal feature extending from the right side of the dike. It looks like bedding. Photo: Murray and others, 2003, Fig. 12.
Clastic dike polygonal network along the Army Loop Road near the infiltration study site. Google Earth photo.
*Footnote 11*
The caption for the 1928 photo above reads,
Contorted bedding in silt and fine sand, Walla Walla Valley. Etched into relief by the wind.
In the body of the article, he notes,
Marked irregularities in stratification of sandy phases occur. One such structure is illustrated in Figure 9. No satisfactory explanation for this is at hand.
In 1923, Bretz writes,
Along Sunset Hiway, 4-5 miles north of Wenatchee, is a cut showing a seasonably banded silt about 200 ft above the altitude of Wenatchee. 30-foot section. Silt is pale buff in color. Some portions a very fine sand, somewhat more gray or brown colored. The seasonal banding is far from perfect thruout...In most summer bands, is a delicate foreset or current bedding, showing very gentle southward drift of the material along the bottom. This doesn't seem right for a water body which recorded varve clays. And there are several other unorthodox things too. Portions of the deposit which do not show varve clay straification are composed of fine sand to silt, not of clay. Current bedding is prominent in this, much more so than in the summer varves. Here and there in the section are worn pebbles and cobble not of basalt or the local granite. These undoubtedly show the presence of floating ice. In certain layer of the finer silt are most peculiar contortions of the laminae, tho the strat immediately above or below are not affected. Some of these contortions were sketched. In each sketch, one prominet continuous lamina has been shown. The others are squeezed or thickened to conform. In [sketch 3] the little triangular areas show fragmentation and porosity. These plications or contortions have a strike. They are rolls! And the strike is essentially parallel to the wall of the valley here. Other evidence, in the existence of gentle flexures in the strata themselves, seems to point to settling of the material down a subaqueous slope toward the deeper parts of the valley as the cause for the distortion.
Bretz's only mention of clastic dikes arrives on July 15, 1929 in typed field notes on Tammany Bar at Lewiston, ID. This is four years after publication of the first article on Touchet Bed clastic dikes by O.P. Jenkins, who visited this same exposure. At Lewiston, Touchet Beds ("silts") overlie a boulder gravel bar left by the Bonneville flood.
The silt rests directly on the rough bouldery surface of the gravel deposit, some boulders a foot or two in diameter setting up on top of the gravel project for their full diameter into the silt...The silt is well sorted, no scattered particle of basalt, etc., rather irregular bedding. Lenses of black coarse sand occur irregularly, the contact of sand on silt being so irregular that it seems like a cross section of miniature mountain topography. To add to the puzzle, clastic dikes can be traced up in the depsit, thickenin with increasing height and some of them abruptly ending at various levels. This silt looks more like a normal stream alluvium, the cracks developing at successive interevals while the accumulation was going on per saltum, thus some of the cracks being filled and covered over before other cracks were formed. Yet there is no such sand on top of the silt today from which the the major number of the cracks (coming to the top) could be filled. Such sand deposit may once have been present, and now gone by erosion.
References
Alwin, J.A., and Scott, W.E., 1970, Clastic dikes of the Touchet Beds, southeastern Washington: Northwest Science, v. 44, p. 58. Ambraseys, N.N., 1991, Engineering seismology: International Journal of Earthquake Structural Dynamics, v. 17, p. 1-105. Atwater, B.F., 1986. Pleistocene glacial-lake deposits of the Sanpoil River Valley, northeastern Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1661, 39 pgs. Atwater, B.F., 1994, Geology of Holocene liquefaction features along the lower Columbia River at Marsh, Brush, Price, Hunting, and Wallace Island, Oregon and Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Open-file Report 94-209, 64 pgs. Bader, N.E., Spencer, P.K., Bailey, A.S., Gastineau, K.M., Tinkler, E.R., Pluhar, C.J., and Bjornstad, B.N., 2016, A loess record of pre-Late Wisconsin glacial outburst flooding, Pleistocene paleoenvironment, and Irvingtonian fauna from the Rulo site, southeastern Washington, USA: Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 462, p. 57-69. Baker, V.R., 1973, Paleohydrology and sedimentology of Lake Missoula flooding in Eastern Washington, Geological Society of America Special Paper 144, 79 pgs. Baker, V.R., and Bunker, R.C., 1985, Cataclysmic Late Pleistocene flooding from Glacial Lake Missoula, A review: Quaternary Science Reviews, v. 4, p. 1-41. Baker, V.R., Bjornstad, B.N., Gaylord, D.R., Smith, G.A., Meyer, S.E.,Alho, P., Breckenridge, R.M., Sweeney, M.R., Zreda, M., 2016, Pleistocene megaflood landscapes of the Channeled Scablands: in Lewis, R.S., and Schmidt, K.L., eds., Exploring the Geology of the Inland Northwest: Geological Society of America Field Guide 41, 73 pgs.
Beaulieu, J.D., 1974, Geologic hazards of Hood River, Wasco, and Sherman Counties, Oregon: Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Bulletin, v. 91, p. 18.
Benito, G., and O'Connor, J.E., 2003, Number and size of last-glacial Missoula floods in the Columbia River valley between the Pasco Basin, Washington, and Portland, Oregon: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 115, p. 624-638. Bennett, S.E.K., Sherrod, B.L., Kelsey, H.M., Reedy, T.J., Lasher, J.P., Paces, J.B., and Mahan, S.A., 2016, History of recent surface rupturing earthquakes on the Burbank fault, Yakima Folds, central Washington: American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, Abstract T41B-2908. Bingham, J.W., and Grolier, M.J., 1966, The Yakima Basalt and Ellensburg Formation of south-central Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1224-G
Bjornstad, B.N., 1982, Catastrophic flood surging represented in the Touchet Beds of the Walla Walla Valley, Washington: American Quaternary Association 7th Biennial Conference Program and Abstracts, p. 72.
Bjornstad, B.N., 2006, On the trail of the Ice Age Floods: A geological field guide to the Mid-Columbia Basin, Keokee Books, 308 pgs. Bjornstad, B.N., Fecht, K.R., and Tallman, A.M., 1990, Quaternary stratigraphy of the Pasco Basin area, south-central Washington: Rockwell International Report RHO-BW-SA-563A, 24 pgs. Bjornstad, B.N., and Teel, S.S., 1993, Natural analog study of engineered protective barriers at the Hanford Site: Pacific Northwest Lab Report PNL-8840 UC-510. Bjornstad, B.N., Fecht, K.R., and Pluhar, C.J., 2001, Long history of Pre-Wisconsin Ice Age cataclysmic floods: Evidence from southeastern Washington State: Journal of Geology, v. 109, p. 695-713. Bjornstad, B.N., and Lanigan, D.C., 2007, Geologic descriptions for the solid-waste low level burial grounds: Pacific Northwest National Lab Report PNNL-16887. Black, R.F., 1979, Clastic dikes of the Pasco Basin, southeastern Washington: Rockwell Hanford Report RHO-BWI-C-64, 65 pgs. Braccini, E., Boer, W., Hurst, A., Huuse, M., Vigorito, M., and Templeton, G., 2008, Sand injectites: Oilfield Review, v. 20, p. 34-49. Bretz, J H., 1929, Valley deposits immediately east of the Channeled Scabland of Washington: Journal of Geology, v .37, p. 393-427.
Bretz, J H., 1929, Unpublished field notes, University of Chicago Library Archives Boyd, K.F., and Schumm, S.A., 1995, Geomorphic evidence of deformation in the northern part of the New Madrid seismic zone: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1538-R, p. 1-35.
Brown, D.J., and Brown, R.E., 1962, Touchet clastic dikes in the Ringold Formation: Hanford Atomic Products Operation Report HW-SA-2851, 11 pgs. Carson, R.J., McKhann, C.F., and M.H. Pizey, M.H., 1978, The Touchet Beds of the Walla Walla Valley: in Baker, V.R., and Nummedal, D. (eds.), The Channeled Scabland: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, p. 173-177. Cobain, S.L., Hodgson, D.M., Peakall, J., and Shiers, M.N., 2016, An integrated model of clastic injectites and basin floor lobe complexes, implications for stratigraphic trap plays: Basin Research, v. 29, p. 816-835. Coppersmith, R., Hanson, K., Unruh, J., and Slack, C., 2014, Structural analysis and Quaternary investigations in support of the Hanford PSHA in Hanford Sitewide Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Report #23361, 173 pgs. Cooley, S.W., 2015, The curious clastic dikes of the Columbia Basin: in Carson, R.J., Many Waters, Natural history of the Walla Walla Valley and vicinity: Keokee Books, p. 90-91 Cooley, S.W., Unpublished photograph of clastic dikes descending from the base of a debris flow deposit in Black Dragon Canyon, San Rafael Swell, UT:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dikes_in_black_dragon_canyon_UT.JPG Cooley, S.W., 2014, Exposures of large clastic dikes in Columbia Basin: A geologic traverse through Washington, Oregon, and Idaho, in Northwest Geology, Tobacco Root Geological Society Guidebook v. 43, p. 133-147
Cooley, S.W., Pidduck, B.K., and Pogue, K.R., 1996, Mechanism and timing of emplacement of clastic dikes in the Touchet Beds of the Walla Walla Valley, south-central Washington: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 28, p. 57.
Fecht, K.R., Bjornstad, B.N., Horton, D.G., Last, G.V., Reidel, S.P., and Lindsey, K.A., 1999, Clastic injection dikes of the Pasco Basin and vicinity: Bechtell-Hanford Report BHI-01103, 217 pgs. Feng, Z.Z., 2017, Preface of the Chinese version of "The seismite problem": Journal of Palaeogeography, v. 6, p. 7-11. Flint, R.F., 1938, Origin of the Cheney-Palouse scabland tract: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 46, p. 169-194. Foundation Sciences, Inc., 1980, Geologic reconnaissance of parts of the Walla Walla and Pullman, Washington, and Pendleton, Oregon 1 x 2 degree AMS quadrangles: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-Seattle District, Report DACW67-80-C-0125, 144 pgs. Fuller, M.L., 1912, The New Madrid earthquake: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 494, 129 pgs. Galli, P., 2000, New empirical relationships between magnitude and distance for liquefaction: Tectonophysics, v. 324, p. 169-187. Glenn, J.L., 1965, Late Quaternary Sedimentation and Geologic History of the North Willamette Valley, OR: PhD Dissertation, Oregon State University, 248 pgs. Gohn, G.S., Weems, R.E., Obermeier, S.F., and Gelinas, R.L., 1984, Field studies of earthquake-induced, liquefaction-flowage features in the Charleston, South Carolina, area: U.S. Geological Survey Preliminary Report, 29 pgs. Hanson, M.A., Lian, O.B., and Clague, J.J., The sequence and timing of large late Pleistocene floods from glacial Lake Missoula: Quaternary Science Reviews, v. 31, p. 67-81. Herriott, T.M., Reger, C.J., Wartes, R.D., LePain, M.A., and DL Gillis, R.J., 2014, Geologic context, age constraints, and sedimentology of a Pleistocene volcaniclastic succession near Mount Spurr volcano, south-central Alaska: Alaska Division of Geological and Geophysical Surveys, Report of Investigation RI-2014-2, 35 pgs. Holtzer, T.L., Noce, T.E., and Bennett, M.J., 2011, Strong ground motion inferred from liquefaction caused by the 1811-1812 New Madrid, Missouri, earthquakes: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 105, p. 2589-2603. Hyashi, T., 1966, Clastic dikes in Japan: Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography, v. 37, p. 1-20. Jenkins, O.P., 1925, Clastic dikes of eastern Washington and their geologic significance American Journal of Science: v. 57, p. 234-246. Jolly, R.J., and Lonergan, L., 2002, Mechanisms and controls on the formation of sand intrusions: Journal of the Geological Society, v. 159, p. 605-617. Jones, F.O., and Deacon, R.J., 1966, Geology and tectonic history of the Hanford Area and its relation to the geology and tectonic history of the state of Washington and the active seismic zones of western Washington and western Montana: Douglas United Nuclear, Inc. Consultants Report DUN-1410, 50 pgs. Kiver, E.P., Stradling, D.F., Roberts, S., and Fountain, D., 1982, Quaternary geology of the Spokane area: Tobacco Root Geological Society 1980 Field Conference Guidebook, p. 26-44. Le Heron, D.P., and Etienne, J.L., 2005, A complex subglacial clastic dyke swarm, Myrdalsjokull, southern Iceland: Sedimentary Geology, v. 181, p. 25-37. Lidke, D.J., Johnson, S.Y., McCrory, P.A., Personius, S.F., Nelson, A.R., Dart, R.L., Bradley, L., Haller, K., and Machette, M.N., 2003, Map and data for Quaternary faults and folds in Washington State, U.S. Geological Survey Open-file Report 03-428, 16 pgs. Lindsey K.A., 1996, The Miocene to Pliocene Ringold Formation and associated deposits of the ancestral Columbia River system, south-central Washington and north-central Oregon: Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources, Open-file Report 96-8, 176 pgs. Lupher, R.L., 1944, Clastic dikes of the Columbia Basin region, Washington and Idaho: Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, v. 55, p.1431-1462. McCalpin, J.P., 2009, Paleoseismology (2nd Edition), Academic Press, 613 pgs. Meyer, S.A., 1999, Depositional history of pre-Late and Late Wisconsin outburst flood deposits in northern Washington and Idaho, Analysis of flood paths and provenance: MS Thesis, Washington State University, 91 pgs.
Miller, C.H.; Odum, J.K.; Lindvall, R.M.; Collins, D.S., 1979, Preliminary magnetic, seismic, and petrographic investigations of a possible igneous dike at the Rocky Mountain Arsenal, Denver, Colorado, USGS Open-file Report 79-1685, 18 pgs. Montenat, C., Barrier, P., d'Estevou, P.O., and Hibsch, C., 2007, Seismites: An attempt at critical analysis and classification: Sedimentary Geology, v. 196, p. 5-30. Moretti, M, and Van Loon, A.J, 2014, Restrictions to application of 'diagnostic' criteria for recognizing ancient seismites: Journal of Palaeogeography, v. 3, p. 162-173.
Murray, C.; Ward, A.; Wilson, J., 2003, Influence of clastic dikes on vertical migration of contaminants in the vadose zone at Hanford, Pacific Northwest National Lab report, PNNL-14224, 41 pgs. Neill, A. R., Leckey, E.H., and Pogue, K.R., 1997, Pleistocene dikes in Tertiary rocks: Downward emplacement of Touchet Bed clastic dikes into co-seismic fissures, south-central Washington: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 29, p. 55. Newcomb, R.C., 1962, Hydraulic injection of clastic dikes in the Touchet Beds, Washington, Oregon, and Idaho: Geological Society of the Oregon Country Bulletin, v. 28, p. 70. Obermeier, S.F., 1996, Use of liquefaction-induced features for paleoseismic analysis: An overview of how seismic liquefaction features can be distinguished from other features and how regional distribution and properties of source sediment can be used to infer the location and strength of Holocene paleoearthquakes: Engineering Geology, v. 44, p. 1-76. Obermeier, S.F., Olson, S.M., and Green, R.A., 2005, Field occurrences of liquefaction-induced features: A primer for engineering geologic analysis of paleoseismic shaking: Engineering Geology, v. 76, p. 209-234. Obermeier, S.F., 2009, Chapter 7: Using liquefaction-induced features for paleoseismic analysis: in McCalpin, J.P., ed., Paleoseismology, Academic Press, p. 497-564. Obermeier, S.F., 1998, Liquefaction evidence for strong earthquakes of Holocene and latest Pleistocene ages in the states of Indiana and Illinois, USA: Engineering Geology, v. 50, p. 227-254. Obermeier, S.F., 1998, Seismic liquefaction features: Examples from paleoseismic investigations in the continental United States: U.S. Geological Survey Open-file Report 98-488 (web version only), https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1998/of98-488. Obermeier, S.F., Martin, J.R., Frankel, A.D., Youd, T.L., Munson, P.J., Munson, C.A., and Pond, E.C., 1993, Liquefaction evidence for one or more strong Holocene earthquakes in the Wabash Valley of southern Indiana and Illinois, with a preliminary estimate of magnitude: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1536, 27 pgs. Obermeier, S.F., Olson, S.M., and Green, R.A., 2005, Field occurrences of liquefaction-induced features: a primer for engineering geologic analysis of paleoseismic shaking: Engineering Geology, v. 76, p. 209-234. Peterson, C.D., and Madin, I.P., 1998, Coseismic paleoliquefaction evidence in the central Cascadia margin, USA: Oregon Geology, v. 59, p. 51-74. Phillips, E.; Lipka, E., and van der Meer, J.J., 2013, Micromorphological evidence of liquefaction, injection and sediment deposition during basal sliding of glaciers: Quaternary Science Reviews, v. 81, p. 114-137. Pogue, K.R., 1998, Earthquake-generated(?) structures in Missoula flood slackwater sediments (Touchet Beds) of southeastern Washington: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 30, p. 398-399.
Pritchard, C.J., and Cebula, L., 2016, Geologic and anthropogenic history of the Palouse Falls area: Floods, fractures, clastic dikes, and the receding falls: in Lewis, R.S., and Schmidt K.L., eds.: Geological Society of America Field Guide, v. 41, p. 75-92. Rigby, J.G., 1982, The sedimentary, mineralogy, and depositional environment of a sequence of Quaternary catastrophic flood-derived lacustrine turbidites near Spokane, WA: MS Thesis, University of Idaho, 132 pgs. Russell, I.C., 1893, A geological reconnoissance in central Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 108, 108 pgs. Seilacher, A., 1969, Fault-graded beds interpreted as seismites: Sedimentology, v. 13, p. 15-159. Shanmugam, G., 2016, The seismite problem: Journal of Palaeogeography, v. 5, p. 318-362. Shaw, J., Munro-Stasiuk, M., Sawyer, B., Beaney, C., Lesemann, J., Musacchio, A., Rains, B., and Young, R.R., 1999, The Channeled Scabland: Back to Bretz?: Geology, v. 27, p. 605-608. Sherrod, B.L., Barnett, E.A., Knepprath, Nichole, and Foit, F.F., Jr., 2013, Paleoseismology of a possible fault scarp in Wenas Valley, central Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3239. Sherrod, B., Blakely, R.J., Lasher, J.P., Lamb, A.P., Mahan, S.A., Foit, F.F., and Barnett, E., 2016, Active faulting on the Wallula fault zone within the Olympic-Wallowa lineament, Washington State, USA: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 128, p. 1636-1659. Silver, M.H., and Pogue, K.R, 2002, Analysis of plan-view geometry of clastic dike networks in Missoula Flood slackwater sediments (Touchet Beds), southeastern Washington: Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, v. 34, p. 24. Smith, G., 1993, Missoula flood dynamics and magnitude inferred from sedimentology of slack-water deposits on the Columbia Plateau: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 105, p. 77-100. Spencer, P.K, and Jaffee, M., 2002, Pre-late Wisconsinan glacial outburst floods in southeastern Washington, the indirect record: Washington Geology, v. 30, p. 9-16.
Sutherland, J.L.; Evans, D.J.A., Carrivick, J.L.; Shulmeister, J.; Rother, H., 2022, A model of ice-marginal sediment-landform development at Lake Tekapo, Southern Alps, New Zealand, Geografiska Annaler: Series A - Physical Geography, p. 1-33
Takada, K.; Atwater, B.F., 2004, Evidence for Liquefaction Identified in peeled slices of Holocene deposits along the lower Columbia River, Washington, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 94, p. 550-575
Tolan, T.L.; Martin, B.S.; Reidel, S.P; Anderson, J.L.; Lindsey, K.A.; Burt, W., 2099, An introduction to the stratigraphy, strucutral geology, and hydrogeology of the Columbia River Flood-Basalt Province: A primer for the GSA Columbia River Basalt Group field trips, Geological Society of America Field Guide #15, p. 599-643
USDOE/WADOE, 1996, FEIS for the tank waste remediation system, Hanford Site, Richland, WA Van Loon, A.T., 2014, The Mesoproterozoic "seismites" at Laiyuan (Hebei Province, E China) re-interpreted: Geologos, v. 20, p. 139-146. Von Brunn, V., and Talbot, C.J., Formation and deformation of subglacial intrusive clastic sheets in the Dwyka Formation of northern Natal, South Africa: Journal of Sedimentary Research, v. 56, p. 35-44. Waitt, R.B., 1980, About forty last-glacial Lake Missoula jokulhlaups through southern Washington: Journal of Geology, v. 88, p. 653-679. Waitt, R.B., 1983, Tens of successive, colossal Missoula floods at north and east margins of Channeled Scabland: Friends of the Pleistocene Rocky Mountain Cell Guidebook for the 1983 Field Conference, 29 pgs. Waitt, R.B., 1985, Case for periodic, colossal jokulhlaups from Pleistocene glacial Lake Missoula: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 96, p. 1271-1286. Waitt, R.B., Breckenridge, R.M., Kiver, E.P, and Stradling, D.F., 2016, Chapter 17: Late Wisconsin Cordilleran Ice Sheet and colossal floods in northeast Washington and Northern Idaho: in Cheney, E.S. (ed.), The Geology of Washington and Beyond, from Laurentia to Cascadia; University of Washington Press, p. 233-256. Walker, E.H., 1967, Varved lake beds in northern Idaho and northeastern Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 575-B, p. 83. Ward, A., Conrad, M.E., Daily, W.D., Fink, J.B., Freedman, V.L., Gee, G.W., Hoverston, G.M., Keller, M.J., Majer, E.L., Murray, C.J., White, M.D., Yabusaki, S.B., Zhang, Z.F., 2006, Vadose zone transport field study summary report, U.S. Department of Energy Report DE-AC05-76RL01830, 288 pgs Woodward-Clyde Consultants, 1981, Task D3: Quaternary sediments study of the Pasco Basin and adjacent areas: Report to Washington State Public Power Supply System, 33 pgs.
